Perhaps this will help explain the issue?
https://stackoverflow.com/a/22279218

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:57 PM Mathieu Prevot <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I think I got a bullseye. No more memory exception at this place, only new
> ones in imageioplugin.
> Just remove the & at "string &arg" at the args.
>
> M
>
> Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 21:41, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
>> The iinfo.exe modification rules out the compiler parameters discepancies.
>>
>> I also thought that we got entry points in both debug and release, and
>> mixing them should not be a problem (I never had), it could be if both
>> debug and release binaries are used.
>>
>> I believe that going to more functional code (with string arguments
>> passed by value) will do the trick.
>>
>> M
>>
>>
>> Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 21:29, Larry Gritz <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>
>>> What about filename2 char addr ??
>>>
>>> I'm trying to figure out if the caller and callee, both pointing to the
>>> *same* string, might have a different notion of the pointer within that
>>> string that says where the characters live.
>>>
>>> What it smells like is that the caller and callee (your program, versus
>>> OIIO dll, compiled separately) disagree on the meaning of the internals of
>>> a std::string. (If this is the case, passing the std::string by value
>>> instead of by reference is also not likely to help things.)
>>>
>>> This makes me continue to suspect that it's a difference in compilers or
>>> compiler settings that is the culprit here.
>>>
>>> As an example in Linux/gcc land, there was a point where the internals
>>> of std::string changed, as an incompatible ABI change, and there, too, you
>>> can get into trouble if, for example, one module is compiled with gcc 4.8
>>> and the other is compiled with gcc 6.3 (with the new ABI), in very much the
>>> same way as what appears to be going on here.
>>>
>>> -- lg
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> filename2 addr = 00000072A38FFBB0
>>> filename2 len = 79
>>> filename2 =
>>> 'C:/sensomovie/C200/A011C118_19041345_CANON/A011C118_19041345_CANON_00002043.DPX'
>>> str addr = 00000072A38FFBB0
>>> str len 79
>>> str char addr = FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE
>>>
>>> throws at
>>>  std::cout << "str first char = " << int(str[0]) << std::endl;
>>>
>>> Exception thrown: read access violation.
>>> std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>
>>> >::operator[](...) returned 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE.
>>>
>>>
>>> M
>>>
>>>
>>> Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 20:57, Larry Gritz <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Right, when it accesses the characters in the callee, it fails for some
>>>> reason.
>>>>
>>>> So the additional line I wanted to add prints the address of the
>>>> characters, before trying to access them. I want to know if the caller and
>>>> callee disagree on *where* those characters are in memory, or are they both
>>>> looking at the same memory but for some other reason the callee can't touch
>>>> them?
>>>>
>>>> Oh, one more!
>>>>
>>>>     std::cout << "str addr = " << (void*)&str << std::endl;
>>>>     std::cout << "str len " << str.size() << std::endl;
>>>>     std::cout << "str char addr = " << (void*)str.c_str() << std::endl;
>>>>     std::cout << "str first char = " << int(str[0]) << std::endl;
>>>>     std::cout << "str chars = '" << str << "'" << std::endl;
>>>>
>>>> Can it access the first character, or is it "running off the end of the
>>>> string", so to speak, when it fails.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In the callee, whatever I try to do it throws.
>>>> Hence I know I'll get something from my code, and nothing from oiio
>>>> function.
>>>> I tried to ask a local copy of str, it just throws at `string localstr
>>>> = str;`
>>>>
>>>> I think it should be wiser to pass string by value and not by reference.
>>>>
>>>> Any thought, objection ?
>>>> M
>>>>
>>>> Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 20:43, Larry Gritz <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm. OK, one more test:
>>>>>
>>>>> In both of the places (caller and callee), can you add one more line
>>>>> in this spot:
>>>>>
>>>>>     std::cout << "str addr = " << (void*)&str << std::endl;
>>>>>     std::cout << "str len " << str.size() << std::endl;
>>>>>     std::cout << "str char addr = " << (void*)str.c_str() << std::endl;
>>>>>     std::cout << "str chars = '" << str << "'" << std::endl;
>>>>>
>>>>> ???
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 10:36 AM, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The output with the modified sources as you requested:
>>>>>
>>>>> filename2 addr = 000000C9E28FF930
>>>>> filename2 len = 79
>>>>> filename2 =
>>>>> 'C:/sensomovie/C200/A011C118_19041345_CANON/A011C118_19041345_CANON_00002043.DPX'
>>>>> str addr = 000000C9E28FF930
>>>>> str len 79
>>>>> str chars = '
>>>>>
>>>>> Access violation reading location 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems it complains about being/not able to read the string, even
>>>>> though the address and length are correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> M
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 18:51, Larry Gritz <[email protected]> a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> So that minimal example also fails?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you add those extra printf lines on the OIIO side that I
>>>>>> suggested a couple messages ago? What did they print?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, next experiment:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Copy those lines inside main() from my minimal example below, and
>>>>>> paste them into OIIO src/info/iinfo.cpp, right in its main() before it 
>>>>>> does
>>>>>> anything else. The point of this test is to see what happens when we are
>>>>>> absolutely sure that the program calling this sequence is built with all
>>>>>> the same compile flags and headers as the OSL library itself. Then build
>>>>>> OIIO in whatever configuration was producing failures reliably before, 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> try by running "iinfo" (it's not the "real" iinfo now, it's just a 
>>>>>> harness
>>>>>> for running that minimal example). What happens, and what does it print
>>>>>> with those debugging statements?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the oiioTest project, there is no test framework, no specific c++
>>>>>> standard is specified (an noe was specified at oiio build).
>>>>>> I'm using v141 toolset in both (the default VS2017 toolset).
>>>>>> The truly minimal program fails too.
>>>>>> Can you use the source and script I provided to reproduce the memory
>>>>>> error ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> M
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le mer. 24 avr. 2019 à 23:59, Larry Gritz <[email protected]> a
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's interesting. Definitely makes me think it's some kind of
>>>>>>> mismatch between your module and OIIO, since the all-OIIO code (using
>>>>>>> oiiotool, which calls the same libOpenImageIO APIs underneath) seems 
>>>>>>> fine.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you sure that OIIO and your code was definitely built with the
>>>>>>> same compiler version? Same flags indicating the C++ standard to use or 
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>> other such things that may be relevant for MSVS?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I would recommend next is trying to find the *minimal*
>>>>>>> separately-compiled program that exhibits the problem. Eliminate your
>>>>>>> testing framework and all other cruft. Would the following truly minimal
>>>>>>> program also fail?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #include <OpenImageIO/imageio.h>
>>>>>>> int main (int argc, char *argv[]);
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>     const char* filename =
>>>>>>> "C:\sensomovie\C200\A011C118_19041345_CANON\A011C118_19041345_CANON_00000001.DPX"
>>>>>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename);
>>>>>>>     if (in) {
>>>>>>>         printf ("Opened successfully\n");
>>>>>>>         printf ("Opened successfully, format is %s\n",
>>>>>>> in->format_name());
>>>>>>>     } else {
>>>>>>>         printf ("Fail\n");
>>>>>>>         return 1;
>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>>     return 0;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2019, at 2:27 PM, Mathieu Prevot <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, it only crashes when I use the API in release, I use the API in
>>>>>>> debug it works too. The output:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> .\oiiotool.exe -info -v
>>>>>>> C:\sensomovie\C200\A011C118_19041345_CANON\A011C118_19041345_CANON_00000001.
>>>>>>> DPX
>>>>>>> Reading
>>>>>>> C:\sensomovie\C200\A011C118_19041345_CANON\A011C118_19041345_CANON_00000001.DPX
>>>>>>> C:\sensomovie\C200\A011C118_19041345_CANON\A011C118_19041345_CANON_00000001.DPX
>>>>>>> : 4096 x 2160, 3 channel, uint10 dpx
>>>>>>>     channel list: R, G, B
>>>>>>>     DateTime: "2019:04:13 16:14:30"
>>>>>>>     Orientation: 1 (normal)
>>>>>>>     PixelAspectRatio: 1
>>>>>>>     Software: "CANON"
>>>>>>>     dpx:Colorimetric: "Unspecified video"
>>>>>>>     dpx:DittoKey: 1
>>>>>>>     dpx:EndOfImagePadding: 0
>>>>>>>     dpx:EndOfLinePadding: 0
>>>>>>>     dpx:FramePosition: 1
>>>>>>>     dpx:FrameRate: 59.9401
>>>>>>>     dpx:HeldCount: 1
>>>>>>>     dpx:ImageDescriptor: "RGB"
>>>>>>>     dpx:InputDeviceSerialNumber: "373449900026"
>>>>>>>     dpx:Interlace: 0
>>>>>>>     dpx:Packing: "Filled, method A"
>>>>>>>     dpx:SequenceLength: 2931
>>>>>>>     dpx:ShutterAngle: 0
>>>>>>>     dpx:SourceDateTime: "2019:04:13 16:14:30"
>>>>>>>     dpx:SourceImageFileName: "A011C118_19041345_CANON.CRM"
>>>>>>>     dpx:TemporalFrameRate: 59.9401
>>>>>>>     dpx:TimeCode: "00:42:11;23"
>>>>>>>     dpx:Transfer: "Unspecified video"
>>>>>>>     dpx:UserBits: 0
>>>>>>>     dpx:UserData: 67, 65, 78, 79, 78, 95, 82, 65, 87, 95, 68, 69,
>>>>>>> 86, 69, 76, 79, ... [63488 x uint8]
>>>>>>>     dpx:Version: "V2.0"
>>>>>>>     oiio:BitsPerSample: 10
>>>>>>>     smpte:TimeCode: 00:42:11:23
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mathieu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le mer. 24 avr. 2019 à 23:24, Larry Gritz <[email protected]> a
>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matthieu, can you confirm:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Does `oiiotool -info -v yourfile.dpx` also crash (with the same
>>>>>>>> filename as you used before, of course)? Or does it only crash when the
>>>>>>>> OIIO API calls are made from your program?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2019, at 1:51 PM, Mathieu Prevot <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello. Many thanks Till for your previous posts and proposition.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm curious to know if the problems can be reproduced.
>>>>>>>> Here are the binaries of oiio, openexr and few dependencies, as
>>>>>>>> well as their source and the powershell script I use to
>>>>>>>> configure/build/install those libraries.
>>>>>>>> There is also the oiioTest project which I use to open the DPX
>>>>>>>> 10bits image.
>>>>>>>> The debug and release configuration are those I used to far. The
>>>>>>>> debug should work and the release should trigger the memory exception, 
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> least certainly when you ask to inline whenever possible.
>>>>>>>> I'm using boost 1.70, the available for download binaries.
>>>>>>>> Everything in x64.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://1drv.ms/f/s!AlUmbfQiLoTZhFUTthzeUkWoB3rc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I built the libraries with the v141 toolset (the latest that comes
>>>>>>>> with VS2017; it also comes with VS2019).
>>>>>>>> I built the oiioTest with v142 as well as  v141, and I observed the
>>>>>>>> same result in both cases.
>>>>>>>> I'll do them again to be certain.
>>>>>>>> I'll try Larry's patches to get to know more, and then post here
>>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll also try Till's binaries, but I can tell already that those
>>>>>>>> binaries are missing:
>>>>>>>> RAW_R.DLL (?)
>>>>>>>> BOOST_FILESYSTEM-VC141-MT-X64-1_66.DLL (no problem to get those
>>>>>>>> boost libraries)
>>>>>>>> BOOST_THREAD-VC141-MT-X64-1_66.DLL
>>>>>>>> LZMA.DLL (?)
>>>>>>>> Maybe a script would be easier to use than binaries.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le mer. 24 avr. 2019 à 20:30, till dechent <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My guess would be that VS2019 being the problem is unlikely since
>>>>>>>>> Mathieu also tried with the vs141 toolset.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To narrow things down between a compile issue and a code issue you
>>>>>>>>> could grab my binaries and see if your code works with them:
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ttddee/oiio-msvc2017
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Or maybe try a build without the command line and go straight from
>>>>>>>>> CMake to Visual Studio to compile from there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have a Windows machine here so if you need me to try anything,
>>>>>>>>> happy to help!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 18:41 Uhr schrieb Larry Gritz <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry to ask you to be my debugging robot, but since I can't
>>>>>>>>>> seem to reproduce on my end...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So let's try another thing. At the call site,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << "reading (float) file: " << filename << "\n";
>>>>>>>>>>     string filename2 = filename;
>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << "filename2 addr = " << (void*)&filename2 <<
>>>>>>>>>> std::endl;
>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << "filename2 len = " << filename2.size() <<
>>>>>>>>>> std::endl;
>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << "filename2 = '" << filename2 << "'\n";
>>>>>>>>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename2);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And inside get_rest_arguments:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> bool
>>>>>>>>>> Strutil::get_rest_arguments(const std::string& str, std::string&
>>>>>>>>>> base,
>>>>>>>>>>                             std::map<std::string, std::string>&
>>>>>>>>>> result)
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << "str addr = " << (void*)&str << std::endl;
>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << "str len " << str.size() << std::endl;
>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << "str chars = '" << str << "'" << std::endl;
>>>>>>>>>>     std::string::size_type mark_pos = str.find_first_of("?");
>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << "result of find_first_of is " << mark_pos <<
>>>>>>>>>> std::endl;
>>>>>>>>>>     ... rest of function as before ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So I'm just trying to establish that we're really getting a
>>>>>>>>>> reference to the same string we thing we were passing, and also 
>>>>>>>>>> whether any
>>>>>>>>>> access to str (including the length) is problematic, or just 
>>>>>>>>>> accessing the
>>>>>>>>>> characters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now, I have one other hypothesis in the back of my mind. You said
>>>>>>>>>> you were using VS2019. I know that people have been using 2015 and 
>>>>>>>>>> 2017,
>>>>>>>>>> but I'm wondering if 2019 is the issue here. In particular, is there 
>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>> chance that VS2019 has changed the representation of std::string 
>>>>>>>>>> (akin to
>>>>>>>>>> how gcc changed its std::string representation in the ~gcc5 time 
>>>>>>>>>> frame)?
>>>>>>>>>> And perhaps is it possible that OIIO's dll itself was compiled with 
>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>> string representation but your program (separate compilation unit) 
>>>>>>>>>> used an
>>>>>>>>>> incompatible one, so that you are passing what you think is a 
>>>>>>>>>> reference to
>>>>>>>>>> a std::string but the OIIO code it's calling has a different idea of 
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> internal layout of a std::string?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or is there any other way that the caller and callee (which are
>>>>>>>>>> in different compilation units and different dlls) might have a 
>>>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>>>> idea of what a std::string means?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ring any bells for anyone?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2019, at 1:22 AM, Mathieu Prevot <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, there might be something wrong in my locales, `str` could
>>>>>>>>>> not be read ( "error reading characters of string" , in my previous 
>>>>>>>>>> post)
>>>>>>>>>> and `filename` was undefined.
>>>>>>>>>> However, that's not necessarily the problem, the memory is
>>>>>>>>>> allocated and I have the same size as in debug (79 characters).
>>>>>>>>>> Before ImageInput::open, I print filename to stdout, and I see a
>>>>>>>>>> correct result.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     cout << "reading (float) file: " << filename;
>>>>>>>>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The right way to be able to read filename is to make a local
>>>>>>>>>> copy; also I make certain that I got the correct type (string), even 
>>>>>>>>>> though
>>>>>>>>>> string has a default constructor from const char.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     cout << "reading (float) file: " << filename;
>>>>>>>>>>     string filename2 = filename;
>>>>>>>>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename2);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It might be related to the character set, but I don't think since
>>>>>>>>>> it did not change from debug to release.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9349342/about-the-character-set-option-in-visual-studio
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In order to acertain this, I did set the character set to "not
>>>>>>>>>> set" and tried also "unicode", but I stil got the same memory error.
>>>>>>>>>> Here the compile command with "not set" ( /D "_UNICODE" /D
>>>>>>>>>> "UNICODE"  are removed):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /permissive- /Yu"pch.h" /GS /GL /W3 /Gy /Zc:wchar_t
>>>>>>>>>> /I"c:\lib\tiff\include" /I"c:\lib\openexr\include" 
>>>>>>>>>> /I"c:\lib\oiio\include"
>>>>>>>>>> /Zi /Gm- /O2 /sdl /Fd"x64\Release\vc142.pdb" /Zc:inline /fp:precise 
>>>>>>>>>> /D
>>>>>>>>>> "NDEBUG" /D "_CONSOLE" /errorReport:prompt /WX- /Zc:forScope /Gd /Oi 
>>>>>>>>>> /MD
>>>>>>>>>> /std:c++17 /FC /Fa"x64\Release\" /EHsc /nologo /Fo"x64\Release\"
>>>>>>>>>> /Fp"x64\Release\oiioTest.pch" /diagnostics:classic
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> `auto` was `const char*`, therefore did not change a thing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> With the new lines you suggested, the memory error happens at the
>>>>>>>>>> first str usage, ie., str.size().
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   std::cout << "str len " << str.size() << " = '" << str << "'"
>>>>>>>>>> << std::endl; // memory error here
>>>>>>>>>>   std::string::size_type mark_pos = str.find_first_of("?");
>>>>>>>>>>   std::cout << "result of find_first_of is " << mark_pos <<
>>>>>>>>>> std::endl;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I tried the local copy with:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     std::string str2 = str; // memory error here
>>>>>>>>>>     std::string::size_type mark_pos2 = str2.find_first_of("?");
>>>>>>>>>>     std::string::size_type mark_pos = str.find_first_of("?");
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The memory error happens at the str2 affectation; str has size 79
>>>>>>>>>> (expected), and cannot be read, str2 has size 0, allocated 0.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not sure where to go next.
>>>>>>>>>> Mathieu
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 24 avr. 2019 à 08:26, Larry Gritz <[email protected]> a
>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know what your "locale" is? Anything unusual?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm also wondering about the /D "_UNICODE" /D "UNICODE"
>>>>>>>>>>> What happens if you don't do that?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your line,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>   auto path =
>>>>>>>>>>> "C:/sensomovie/C200/A011C118_19041345_CANON/A011C118_19041345_CANON_00001926.DPX";
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if you instead used
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     const char* path =
>>>>>>>>>>> "C:/sensomovie/C200/A011C118_19041345_CANON/A011C118_19041345_CANON_00001926.DPX";
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> if that changes anything?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The other idea I had is in get_rest_arguments
>>>>>>>>>>> (src/libutil/strutil.cpp), could you instrument it like this just 
>>>>>>>>>>> to see
>>>>>>>>>>> what happens:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> bool
>>>>>>>>>>> Strutil::get_rest_arguments(const std::string& str, std::string&
>>>>>>>>>>> base,
>>>>>>>>>>>                             std::map<std::string, std::string>&
>>>>>>>>>>> result)
>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << "str len " << str.size() << " = '" << str <<
>>>>>>>>>>> "'" << std::endl;
>>>>>>>>>>>     std::string::size_type mark_pos = str.find_first_of("?");
>>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << "result of find_first_of is " << mark_pos <<
>>>>>>>>>>> std::endl;
>>>>>>>>>>>     ... rest of function as before ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and see if there is anything interesting printed immediately
>>>>>>>>>>> prior to the crash?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 23, 2019, at 2:53 PM, Mathieu Prevot <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I use a debug oiio, and release project; in that case I managed
>>>>>>>>>>> to get a call stack.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> `str` in `bool Strutil::get_rest_arguments(const std::string&
>>>>>>>>>>> str, std::string& base, std::map<std::string, std::string>& result)`
>>>>>>>>>>> has a problem ("error reading characters of string").
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OpenImageIO.dll!OpenImageIO_v2_1::Strutil::get_rest_arguments(const
>>>>>>>>>>> std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char> 
>>>>>>>>>>> > & str,
>>>>>>>>>>> std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char> 
>>>>>>>>>>> > &
>>>>>>>>>>> base,
>>>>>>>>>>> std::map<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>
>>>>>>>>>>> >,std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>
>>>>>>>>>>> >,std::less<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >,std::allocator<std::pair<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>
>>>>>>>>>>> > const 
>>>>>>>>>>> > ,std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>
>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > & result) Line 270    C++
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      OpenImageIO.dll!OpenImageIO_v2_1::ImageInput::create(const
>>>>>>>>>>> std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char> 
>>>>>>>>>>> > &
>>>>>>>>>>> filename, bool do_open, const OpenImageIO_v2_1::ImageSpec * config,
>>>>>>>>>>> OpenImageIO_v2_1::string_view plugin_searchpath) Line 512    C++
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      OpenImageIO.dll!OpenImageIO_v2_1::ImageInput::open(const
>>>>>>>>>>> std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char> 
>>>>>>>>>>> > &
>>>>>>>>>>> filename, const OpenImageIO_v2_1::ImageSpec * config) Line 106    
>>>>>>>>>>> C++
>>>>>>>>>>> >    oiioTest.exe!DPXio::ReadFloat(char *) Line 31    C++
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Here my function:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> auto DPXio::ReadFloat(const char* filename) ->
>>>>>>>>>>> SparseArray<float>*
>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename);
>>>>>>>>>>>     if (!in) return nullptr;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     auto spec = in->spec();
>>>>>>>>>>>     DPXfloat.SetSize(spec);
>>>>>>>>>>>     in->read_image(TypeDesc::FLOAT, DPXfloat.Values);
>>>>>>>>>>>     in->close();
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     return &DPXfloat;
>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and it is called this way:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     auto sut = new DPXio();
>>>>>>>>>>>     auto path =
>>>>>>>>>>> "C:/sensomovie/C200/A011C118_19041345_CANON/A011C118_19041345_CANON_00001926.DPX";
>>>>>>>>>>>     //auto path =
>>>>>>>>>>> "C:/sensomovie/C200/A014C203_190414BL_CANON_16bits/A014C203_190414BL_CANON_00001331.DPX";
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     std::cout << (FileExist(path) ? "File OK: " : "No such file:
>>>>>>>>>>> ") << path << "." << endl;
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     auto result = sut->ReadFloat(path);
>>>>>>>>>>>     if (result == nullptr)
>>>>>>>>>>>         cout << "null result" << endl;
>>>>>>>>>>>     else
>>>>>>>>>>>     {
>>>>>>>>>>>         cout << "colors: " << result->Colors << endl;
>>>>>>>>>>>         cout << "width: " << result->Width << endl;
>>>>>>>>>>>         cout << "height: " << result->Height << endl;
>>>>>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The compilation arguments (I'm using VS2019 enterprise, toolset
>>>>>>>>>>> Visual Studio 2019 (v142), but I have the same with v141):
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> /permissive- /Yu"pch.h" /GS /GL /W3 /Gy /Zc:wchar_t
>>>>>>>>>>> /I"c:\lib\tiff\include" /I"c:\lib\openexr\include" 
>>>>>>>>>>> /I"c:\lib\oiio\include"
>>>>>>>>>>> /Zi /Gm- /O2 /sdl /Fd"x64\Release\vc142.pdb" /Zc:inline /fp:precise 
>>>>>>>>>>> /D
>>>>>>>>>>> "NDEBUG" /D "_CONSOLE" /D "_UNICODE" /D "UNICODE" 
>>>>>>>>>>> /errorReport:prompt /WX-
>>>>>>>>>>> /Zc:forScope /Gd /Oi /MD /FC /Fa"x64\Release\" /EHsc /nologo
>>>>>>>>>>> /Fo"x64\Release\" /Fp"x64\Release\oiioTest.pch" /diagnostics:classic
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 23 avr. 2019 à 23:39, till dechent <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I built version 2.0.6 as a release (x64) and it worked. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> also tried the DPX you provided and all was good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 21:44 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Prevot <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, can those who could open images with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> `ImageInput::open(filename)`
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell if it was a release or debug build (of their own binary,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not oiio's) ? If it was a debug, can you test with a release 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> build ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Many thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le lun. 22 avr. 2019 à 16:35, Mathieu Prevot <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tested with boost 1.68 and 1.70, both are OK with oiio debug,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and opening the DPX file works correctly in that configuration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only when I build and use oiio *release*, it fails (with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both boost versions).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure where to go to continue the investigation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For repro, my build script; which needs to be run in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ooio-master folder as is. msbuild needs to be in $path.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $target = "Visual Studio 15 2017 Win64"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function configure {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     I:\IntelSWTools\compilers_and_libraries_2019.3.203
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> \windows\tbb\bin\tbbvars.bat intel64 vs2017
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     cmake.exe -G $target -T v141, host=x64 -j16 `
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I:/lib/tiff;I:\lib\boost-1.70;I:/lib/zlib;I:/lib/libpng;I:/lib/openexr;I:/lib/libjpegturbo"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> `
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         -DTBB_ROOT_DIR=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "I:/IntelSWTools/compilers_and_libraries/windows/tbb" `
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX="I:/lib/oiio-release" `
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         -DJPEGTURBO_PATH="i:/lib/libjpegturbo" `
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         -DUSE_QT=0 -DOIIO_BUILD_TESTS=1 -DUSE_PYTHON=0 `
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         -DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE="I:/intelpython2/python.exe" `
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         ..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function build {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     #"build oiio debug"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     #MSBuild.exe OpenImageIO.sln /verbosity:m /m
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     "build oiio release"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     MSBuild.exe OpenImageIO.sln /p:Configuration=Release 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /verbosity:m
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /m
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function install {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     #"install oiio debug"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     #MSBuild.exe INSTALL.vcxproj /verbosity:m /m
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     "install oiio release"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     MSBuild.exe INSTALL.vcxproj /p:Configuration=Release 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /verbosity:m
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /m
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function clean {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     if (test-path build) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         remove-item -recurse -force build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     New-Item -ItemType Directory build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Set-Location build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Set-Location ..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le sam. 20 avr. 2019 à 19:10, Larry Gritz <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure what else I can do unless I either have a case
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can reproduce on my end, or a more full stack trace or at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indication of what specific line in the OIIO is where the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thrown (just knowing precisely where the crash happens may be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diagnose or defensively program around).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2019, at 2:11 AM, till dechent <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ImageInput::open() works for me with the downloaded DPX on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 2.0.6.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Do., 18. Apr. 2019 um 18:41 Uhr schrieb Stephen Blair <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't crash on Windows for me, but that's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with OpenImageIO-Arnold 2.1.0dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:07 PM Larry Gritz <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, thanks. I'm able to open that DPX file on my end (not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on Windows), so I don't think it's a corrupt file.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you build all of OIIO in Debug mode (not Release) and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use the debugger to find out what file and line is where the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actual crash
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is occurring? The screenshot you provided only shows where in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test it was, so the actual crash could be practically 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anywhere inside what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens within the open() call.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sorry I'm not easily able to help, I don't have access
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to a Windows machine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can somebody else out there who uses OIIO on Windows
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please do us a favor and download this DPX file in the links 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below, then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try anything that forces an open (e.g., 'iinfo -v -stats 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blah.dpx') and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report what happens? Does this crash for everybody? If anyone 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce, do you have any ideas or can you get closer to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finding what line
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within the OIIO code is the source of the problem?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- lg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 18, 2019, at 1:16 AM, Mathieu Prevot <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following the documentation "4.1 Image Input Made Simple";
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm having an exception at opening a dpx file and tiff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file from simple code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename); // here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     if (!in) return;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception thrown at 0x00007FFDBEBDA388 in testhost.exe:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft C++ exception:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft::VisualStudio::CppUnitTestFramework::CSEException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More detailed information:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://1drv.ms/u/s!AlUmbfQiLoTZhFQir--TvMglJ0iT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Images:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://1drv.ms/f/s!AlUmbfQiLoTZhFKpXHJcchpi0hBY
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm using the master version of oiio in windows with tiff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.10, openexr 2.3.0, zlib 1.2.11, libpng 1.6.35, boost 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.70, libjpegturbo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.3, tbb 2019.3; cmake 3.13.4, VS2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm running this in a c++ unit test, (with some c code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since data will be used in an interop context).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TEST_CLASS(DPXioTests)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     public:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         TEST_METHOD(Instance)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             auto sut = new DPXio();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             Assert::IsNotNull(sut);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         TEST_METHOD(ReadDPX)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             auto sut = new DPXio();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             auto path =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:/sensomovie/C200/A011C118_19041345_CANON/A011C118_19041345_CANON_00001926.DPX";
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             if(!FileExist(path))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 wstringstream s;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 s << "No such file: " << path << ".";
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 Logger::WriteMessage(s.str().c_str());
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 return;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 auto result = sut->Read(path);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 Assert::IsNotNull(result);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 Assert::IsTrue(result->Colors >= 3);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 Assert::IsTrue(result->Height == 2160);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 Assert::IsTrue(result->Width == 4096);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             catch (Exception& e)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 auto lastErrorID = GetLastError();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 if (lastErrorID != 0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     LPVOID errorBuffer{};
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FormatMessage(FORMAT_MESSAGE_ALLOCATE_BUFFER | 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FORMAT_MESSAGE_IGNORE_INSERTS,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                         nullptr, lastErrorID,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MAKELANGID(LANG_NEUTRAL, SUBLANG_DEFAULT), 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (LPTSTR)&errorBuffer, 0,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nullptr);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     wstringstream s;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     s << "Exception: " << e.what() << ".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID: "<< lastErrorID << ". Message: " <<  errorBuffer<< ".";
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     Logger::WriteMessage(s.str().c_str());
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     wstringstream s;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     s << "Exception: " << e.what();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     Logger::WriteMessage(s.str().c_str());
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     };
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mathieu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Larry Gritz
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Oiio-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>
_______________________________________________
Oiio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

Reply via email to