So to tie up this thread, does it point to anything we should be doing better 
on the OIIO side?

        -- lg


> On Jul 12, 2019, at 7:17 PM, Jim Hourihan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Looking over FindBoost.cmake I’m not sure what’s happening, but if I pass 
> this to cmake:
> 
>     -DBoost_NO_BOOST_CMAKE=ON
> 
> the problem also goes away. In that case FindBoost.cmake behaves just like 
> with the other boost versions and doesn’t use the boost cmake files. I have 
> yet to grok cmake fully so debugging FindBoost.cmake is a little outside my 
> comfort zone. Anyway, I’ll be glad to help out if anybody wants to try 
> something else. Otherwise this seems like an OK solution for me right now.
> 
>    -Jim
> 
>> On Jul 12, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Jim Hourihan <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Ok. I switched to linux with cmake 3.13.4 with similar results. I also 
>> noticed that if I remove the $PREFIX/lib/cmake dir 1.70 makes before 
>> building OIIO then I have no problems. 
>> 
>> 1.53, 1.61, 1.66 all work fine but they don’t install anything in 
>> $PREFIX/lib/cmake so maybe not surprising.
>> 
>> Larry, on your machine is there a cmake dir in brew’s lib dir? Is it 
>> possible its not using boost’s cmake files for you?
>> 
>> I’ll continue looking.
>> 
>>    -Jim
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 12, 2019, at 3:41 PM, Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> It's always something.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 12, 2019, at 3:38 PM, Jim Hourihan <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> No, but I can try that. The custom prefix build looks pretty kosher to me. 
>>>> Let me mess with it some more and see if I can figure it out. Maybe I 
>>>> forgot to turn the computer on or some other stupid problem. 
>>>> 
>>>>    -Jim
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 12, 2019, at 3:31 PM, Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dumb question: If you're using MacPorts/Brew, did you try installing 
>>>>> Boost via whichever of those you like, and see if OIIO/CMake just picks 
>>>>> it up properly without the custom boost build?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm just wondering if that custom boost build has laid out the files in 
>>>>> some funky way that is confusing things?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 12, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Jim Hourihan <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> cmake version 3.14.2
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Its installed in /opt/local so that’s from macports if I remember 
>>>>>> correctly. I’m being super slow here so I haven’t tried 1.53 yet.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   -Jim
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 2019, at 3:15 PM, Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You could say that about any of our FindBlah.cmake files -- they need 
>>>>>>> to be kept up to date if the dependencies change in some way that 
>>>>>>> causes the old find's to no longer work. But sure, I see your point.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is it worth a check in externalpackages.cmake to see if cmake < 1.14 && 
>>>>>>> boost >= 1.70 and if so, print a warning that says that this combo may 
>>>>>>> not work and if their build is failing to find boost, they should try 
>>>>>>> upgrading cmake?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Aside: I build just fine on my Mac laptop with Boost 1.70 installed by 
>>>>>>> homebrew.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jim, do you know which version of cmake you are using?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 2019, at 2:58 PM, Thiago Ize <[email protected] 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What happens when the oiio FindBoost.cmake you include becomes too 
>>>>>>>> old? It's not too hard to install newer cmake builds...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019, 3:28 PM Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Do you think, then, that we should embed a copy of FindBoost.cmake 
>>>>>>>> into OIIO, so that people with older cmake and newer boost don't have 
>>>>>>>> to install a whole new cmake? Does it rely on any new cmake features 
>>>>>>>> (I mean, how old a cmake will run cmake 1.14's FindBoost.cmake)?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 2019, at 11:37 AM, Nathan R <[email protected] 
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It sounds like the FindBoost.cmake module distributed with CMake 
>>>>>>>>> itself had to be updated in order to support Boost 1.70+, so it may 
>>>>>>>>> just be a matter of updating CMake (or grabbing a fresh copy of 
>>>>>>>>> FindBoost.cmake from the repo).
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Possibly relevant:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2019-April/069324.html 
>>>>>>>>> <https://cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2019-April/069324.html>
>>>>>>>>> https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/18865 
>>>>>>>>> <https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/18865>
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/commit/266808c4130a0b40aed236381707462a9368a1eb#diff-555801259d7df67368f7deab1f9deacd
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/commit/266808c4130a0b40aed236381707462a9368a1eb#diff-555801259d7df67368f7deab1f9deacd>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -Nathan
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 7/12/2019 10:59 AM, Jim Hourihan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Larry, here's the output from a couple of different failures and 
>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>> successful configure. It doesn't seem to matter if I use the release 
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>> master branch. I've omitted all the non-boost output since those are 
>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>> regardless.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It seems to me find_package() should be picking up the Boost_* 
>>>>>>>>>> variables
>>>>>>>>>> but isn't. Those are definitely not defined in boost's cmake files 
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> 1.70.0. I've made sure there are no other copies of boost anywhere 
>>>>>>>>>> on my
>>>>>>>>>> machine (mac 10.14.5) including brew and ports versions.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking I should try boost 1.53 and compare its .cmake files 
>>>>>>>>>> against
>>>>>>>>>> 1.70. 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the help.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>   -Jim
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 2019, at 10:42 PM, Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I use Boost 1.70 on my Mac (via Homebrew, so it's in /usr/local), 
>>>>>>>>>>> and as a matter of fact I just tested building against Boost 1.70 
>>>>>>>>>>> on Linux at work this week. So I know it works.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Under ordinary circumstances, you shouldn't have to set those 
>>>>>>>>>>> things individually that you mention below.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> It *ought* to be enough to -DBOOST_ROOT=$PREFIX
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> If things are laid out strangely underneath the prefix, though, you 
>>>>>>>>>>> may want to use -DBOOST_INCLUDEDIR=/custom/include/dir 
>>>>>>>>>>> -DBOOST_LIBRARYDIR=/custom/lib/dir
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> If that doesn't work, can you show us the resulting CMakeCache.txt 
>>>>>>>>>>> and exactly what errors it prints?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Which version of OIIO are you building? Do you still have the 
>>>>>>>>>>> problem with master?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 2019, at 7:03 PM, Jim Hourihan <[email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, I’m having some weird interaction between OIIO and boost’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>> cmake package files. I have a prefix area (let’s call it  
>>>>>>>>>>>> /prefix/area) which I install all of OIIO’s dependencies into 
>>>>>>>>>>>> including boost 1.70.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Boost creates files and dirs in /prefix/area/lib/cmake. When I 
>>>>>>>>>>>> point OIIO at the prefix area for building and let it find boost  
>>>>>>>>>>>> by itself it does, but then fails in OIIO’s externalpackages.cmake 
>>>>>>>>>>>> line 121. That line is attempting to dereference the variable 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS which is set to nothing. The weird thing is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> that find_packages() does successfully say it found boost. I 
>>>>>>>>>>>> assume something has changed in 1.70.0 with how they’re writing 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the cmake files but my cmake-fu is very poor.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> To get around it I’m passing the Boost_* variables directly to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> cmake since externalpackages.cmake mercifully allows that as an 
>>>>>>>>>>>> option.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> My questions are:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any issues with using 1.70.0 or does everybody still use 1.53?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the expected values of the Boost_* variables? I’m passing:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>              -DBoost_VERSION=1.70.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>>>>>> -DBoost_LIBRARIES='boost_filesystem;boost_system;boost_thread’
>>>>>>>>>>>>              -DBoost_INCLUDE_DIRS=$PREFIX/include
>>>>>>>>>>>>              -DBoost_LIBRARY_DIRS=$PREFIX/lib
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> What should BOOST_ROOT be set to? Seems like OIIO doesn’t care if 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it’s set.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>    -Jim
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Larry Gritz
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oiio-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

--
Larry Gritz
[email protected]




_______________________________________________
Oiio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

Reply via email to