Update docs after release if you must, just like we had decided of the other doc stuff.

+1 toss it up Brian.

R

On Mar 18, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Armin Waibel wrote:

Brian McCallister wrote:
How are things, can we release? I'm getting antsy on this.


The odmg-stuff is in CVS now. We need to update documentation to reflect the new odmg behavior. Will do this today/tomorrow after doing this I give +1 for release.


Armin



-Brian
On Mar 14, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Armin Waibel wrote:
Say we have an object with circular reference
A1 -1:1-> B1 -1:n-> [A1,C]
and the 1:n is a collection proxy.

Now user lookup A1 and get [EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] He wants to remove the C object in the 1:n reference in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Because B has an proxy collection, the proxy materialize on
B.getC's().remove(1) ==> remove C
call.
While materialization of the collection proxy OJB lookup again an A1 instance. Because the previous materialzed [EMAIL PROTECTED] instance isn't in the cache, so OJB lookup a new instance for A1 ==> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and a new [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thus we have [EMAIL PROTECTED] --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -->[EMAIL PROTECTED]@22[-->[EMAIL PROTECTED] >[EMAIL PROTECTED] !!!!
Needless to say this will cause problems on update.


Any suggestions?

Is this new because of cache-changes and/or ODMG API cache-usage in 1.0.2?



No, think this problem was always alive in all OJB versions, all API - when combine different cache than "default", proxies, circular references.
It does not occur when a global "object instance sharing" cache is used (ObjectCacheDefaultImpl and this was used by default in previous versions).



If _not_ regression since 1.0.1, my suggestion is simply to document under known issues that "using the ODMG API with collection proxies and a cache implementation other than ObjectCacheDefaultImpl is known to cause problems on update, please do not use this combination in production environments with this relase of OJB".
(Or preferably something shorter). ;)



ok, agree we can't fix this till next release.


This way we could release 1.0.2 and get some time to solve this properly without the stress of an upcoming release.


ok, will try to resolve the other odmg issues today or in 20 hours, so that Brian can build the release tomorrow.

Armin

Regards,
Martin
------------------------------------------------------------------- --
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------------------- -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


!DSPAM:423b2e23100481035314068!


Robert S. Sfeir robert(at)codepuccino.com "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler" - Einstein


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to