It should. Did you make the junit test first? 1. Set java_home 2. In command prompt - bin\build junit 3. If Ok you may test - bin\build prepare-tutorials
Regards, ===================== Muhammad Ashikuzzaman Programmer, Spectrum Engineering Consortium Ltd. -----Original Message----- From: Hiran Chaudhuri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1:54 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: 0.9.9 doesn't build Maybe the build script (ant) could check for existence and make verbose messages like "The file lib\foo.jar" ist still missing. Please download it from http://www.foo.org";...? A readme must be read, and anyone just trying to build will spend time searching the error, but if such build error occur this time is saved. Hiran ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Mahler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:35 PM Subject: Re: 0.9.9 doesn't build > Hi again Chris, > > You will have noticed, that the mentioned jars (and some others) are > include in the actual 0.9.9 relase. > We are currently preparing for a completely apache hosted distribution. > We are not allowed to have jars with certain licenses (GPL, LPGL, SUN > binary code license) in CVS or in our distributions. > > I'd also prefer to ship everything needed, but we are simply not allowed > to do so :-( > > But we will provide a dependency page listing all jars we depend on, and > where to get them. > > cheers, > Thomas > > > > > Chris Rossi wrote: > > Chris Rossi wrote: > > > >> > >> ok. i'll see if i can pull latest. > > > > > > > ok i've pulled the latest from CVS and can't build because it can't find > > some libraries: > > > > javax.servlet.* > > javax.transaction.* > > javax.sql.* > > javax.ejb.* > > > > maybe one or two others i didn't notice just now scrolling through the > > build errors. anyway, while i can certainly now go track down these > > libraries and add them to my db-ojb/lib so i can build, it seems like it > > would be faster if ojb shipped with what it need to build out of the > > box. is there a philosophical or technical reason not to do so? > > > > rossi > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
