On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 07:29:06AM +0200, Thomas Mahler wrote: > I don't understand that question.
I was wondering, if they couldn't maintain their website, then how could they maintain the standards? > We do support ODMG 3.0. Period. The question is not about OJB support on ODMG, but about the future of ODMG. I mean, if ODMG wouldn't grow in the next 10 years, then there's no reason to invest the efforts on it. > ODMG announced a long time ago that 3.0 will be the final version and > that there is no further investment into the spec. That's known for a > very long time now. I see. > If they close their site it does not affect our commitment to support > ODMG 3.0. I believe it would be better to spend your time in supporting JDO; or some other standards you see fit. I just couldn't imagine there's a standards body which doesn't have a running website. Oki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
