Thomas,

Thanks for the reply.  My question actually stemmed from some others working
on the project, who wanted to make sure our solution could integrate if a
given client had already purchased a commercial JDO implementation.

If we had to do this, I wanted to shield applications sitting on top of OJB
from the underlying implementation.

Personally, I like OJB's APIs and mapping files better than those put out by
the JDO spec.  ESPECIALLY your query APIs, I don't want to write any *QL.
Well, I'm happy to write SQL, but not OQL, JDOQL, or EJBQL.

However, the real need was to be able to integrate with a distributed cache
like Tangosol.  So I was happy to see Jason McKerr's recent email/blog about
integrating OJB + Tangosol!

Alex


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 11:10 AM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: OJB + commercial JDO ?


Hi Alex,

I have no idea what kind of integration you are looking for.
If you are using a commercial JDO O/R tool why should you use OJB?

Or are you looking for that kind of integration that we did with the OJB
JDORI plugin for SUN's JDO RI?
If so it depends on the layering of the commercial tool. Maybe it's as
easy as for the OJB JDORI plugin.
But if there is no clear layering than it will be a lot of work.

cheers,
Thomas


Bates, Alex wrote:
> Has anyone used OJB with a commercial JDO implementation?  (esp. Solar
> Metric?)  If so, could you give an idea of the work required to integrate
> the two?
>
> thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to