Hi Armin,
> Hi Jair jr,
>
> Jair da Silva Ferreira Júnior wrote:
> > Hi Armin,
> > Thank you very much for your fast reply.
> >
> >
> >>it's a(/my) bug in ObjectCacheDefaultImpl (rc5) causing this strange
> >>behaviour. I will check in a fixed version tomorrow.
> >
> >
> > Ok. How can I get the fixed ObjectCacheDefaultImpl implementation?
Only
> > through CVS?
>
> Yes, it's in CVS head. Release date of final 1.0 is 04 Jan (+-?days) and
> it will contain all fixes.
>
> > Are you going to deploy a new rc5 binary version with this fix?
> >
> If you interested in a binary CVS snapshoot I can send you one.
Thanks, but as my project is on schedule I think I can wait for the
final 1.0 OJB version which, as you said, will be available in 1 or 2 days.
Thanks for your help,
Jair Jr
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Jair Jr
> >
> >
> >>Jair da Silva Ferreira Júnior wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>> I am using ojb1.0_rc5, ODMG api with OJB queries, mysql4 (innodb
> >
> > tables) in Linux Red Hat 7.3 (kernel 2.4.20-20.7).
> >
> >>> I moved from rc4 to rc5 recently and I noticed that sometimes when
I
> >
> > run a query the resulting associated objects don't come from the cache.
> > Please, take a look at the above code to better undestand what I am
saying:
> >
> >>> Transaction t=implementation.newTransaction();
> >>> t.begin();
> >>> Person p=new Person();
> >>> t.lock(p,t.WRITE);
> >>> p.setName("somebody");
> >>> Dog d=new Dog();
> >>> t.lock(d,t.WRITE);
> >>> d.setName("Spike");
> >>> p.setDog(d);
> >>> t.commit();
> >>>
> >>> t=implementation.newTransaction();
> >>> t.begin();
> >>> Criteria crit=new Criteria();
> >>> crit.addEqualTo("_id",new Integer(p.getId()));
> >>> QueryByCriteria query=QueryFactory.newQuery(Person.class,crit);
> >>> PersistenceBroker broker=((HasBroker)t).getBroker();
> >>> broker.removeFromCache(p);
> >>> Person loaded=(Person)broker.getObjectByQuery(query);
> >>> boolean cacheOk=(loaded.getDog()==d); //here cacheOk==false
sometimes
> >>> t.commit();
> >>>
> >>> The atributes (proxy, refresh, auto-retrieve, auto-update and
> >
> > auto-delete) in the reference-descriptor for the association between
Person
> > and Dog have default values. This way, refresh="false".
> >
> >>> This problem does not happen everytime. So, sometimes
cacheOk==true.
> >>> I wasn't able to reproduce this problem in a test case, but it does
> >
> > happen sometimes.
> >
> >>> I've used rc4 for a long time and I've never had this kind of
> >
> > problem.
> >
> >>> Here's my cache configuration in OJB.properties:
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> > ObjectCacheClass=org.apache.ojb.broker.cache.ObjectCacheDefaultImpl
> >
> >>> descriptorBasedCaches=false
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>> Jair Jr
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
