Hey Armin, Sorry it took me so long. I've finally got some nodes up and running and will begin testing the cluster. I'm still a bit confused as to how to integrate Thomas's lock servlet with an existing servlet infrastructure in a simple way, but I'll get there.
J On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 09:25, Armin Waibel wrote: > it's in CVS, we do a migration to Forrest for document generation > > Armin > > Jason McKerr wrote: > > > Is that in CVS or in the latest release? > > > > JAson > > > > On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 09:20, Armin Waibel wrote: > > > >>Jason McKerr wrote: > >> > >> > >>>That's correct. But it apparently isn't clear enough. I will add a > >>>short note to the documentation about that. > >>> > >> > >>Jason, please check out the new "howto-work-with-clustering.xml" under > >>[db-ojb]/forrest/src/documentation/content/xdocs/docu > >> > >>Thanks! > >> > >>regards, > >>Armin > >> > >> > >>>Jason > >>> > >>>On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 01:42, Enrique Medina wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Solved! > >>>> > >>>>The problem was, as I commented in my post, a misconception about what a > >>>>distributed cache really has to do. I thought even read changes had to be > >>>>notified to the rest of the cluster, but after a deep reading and > >>>>investigation of other managers of distributed cache, I realized that only > >>>>updating changes are communicated through JGroups by OSCache. > >>>> > >>>>Thanks anyway for the support, > >>>>Enrique Medina. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>From: Jason McKerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>Reply-To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>To: OJB Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>Subject: Re: Clustered cache with OSCache & JavaGroups > >>>>>Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:05:26 -0700 > >>>>> > >>>>>OK, I won't be able to exactly duplicate your environment since we don't > >>>>>have any windows computers here at the Open Source Lab, but I'll see > >>>>>what I can get. Shouldn't matter anyway, but it always seems too... > >>>>> > >>>>>Jason > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 00:10, Enrique Medina wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Websphere Server within WSAD 5.1 & Windows 2000 Professional > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>From: Jason McKerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>Reply-To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>To: OJB Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>Subject: Re: Clustered cache with OSCache & JavaGroups > >>>>>>>Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:45:45 -0700 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Not really sure what the problem is here. I will attempt to set up > >>>>> > >>>>>some > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>nodes here at the OSL over the next day or two and debug. What Web > >>>>>>>container/OS are you using? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Jason > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 11:14, Enrique Medina wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Cache events are correct, but they are "local". I mean, when the > >>>>> > >>>>>first > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>instance caches an object, it is supposed to inform the other > >>>>> > >>>>>instance, > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>through JavaGroups, but this communication doesn't happen. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>From: Jason McKerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>Reply-To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>To: OJB Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: Clustered cache with OSCache & JavaGroups > >>>>>>>>>Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:24:41 -0700 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>The debug output will show the cache events being handled such as > >>>>> > >>>>>read > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>and gets from the cache. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>Jason > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 09:53, Enrique Medina wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>What do you exactly want to log? What do you want me to show > >>>>> > >>>>>about > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>the > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>logging messages? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>From: Jason McKerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>>>Reply-To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>>>To: OJB Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: Clustered cache with OSCache & JavaGroups > >>>>>>>>>>>Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:20:56 -0700 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>Can you add the a line to your/a log4j properties files that > >>>>> > >>>>>lowers > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>the > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>debug level? It would look like: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>log4j.category.com.opensymphony.oscache=DEBUG > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 07:58, Enrique Medina wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>I have developed a web application with OJB, as the ORM for > >>>>> > >>>>>data > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>access. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>But > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>now, I want to use OJB in a clustered environment. I have > >>>>> > >>>>>read > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>with > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>attention the information provided at the web: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-work-with-clustering.html > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>with respect to setting up OSCache to work with OJB in a > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>cluster. I > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>have > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>strictly followed all the steps commented in this tutorial, > >>>>> > >>>>>and > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>have > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>made a > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>little client test application to see the results. > >>>>> > >>>>>Everything > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>seems > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>to > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>start > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>perfectly, but no cache communication exists between two > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>instances > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>of > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>this > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>client test application at all! > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>I am using OJB RC6 with latest version of OSCache & > >>>>> > >>>>>JavaGroups > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>deployed > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>within OSCache distribution. I have a simple test > >>>>> > >>>>>application > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>consisting > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>of: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>1 public static void main(String[] args) > >>>>>>>>>>>>2 { > >>>>>>>>>>>>3 // Obtain a connection through OJB broker. > >>>>>>>>>>>>4 PersistenceBroker broker = > >>>>>>>>>>>>PersistenceBrokerFactory.defaultPersistenceBroker(); > >>>>>>>>>>>>5 > >>>>>>>>>>>>6 // Create a new query by example that should return all > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>clients. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>7 Query query = QueryFactory.newQueryByExample(new > >>>>> > >>>>>ClientVO()); > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>8 Collection clients = broker.getCollectionByQuery(query); > >>>>>>>>>>>>9 > >>>>>>>>>>>>10 // Ask again for the collection of clients. > >>>>>>>>>>>>11 Collection againClients = > >>>>> > >>>>>broker.getCollectionByQuery(query); > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>12 } > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>I set a breakpoint on lines 8 and 11, just before obtaining > >>>>> > >>>>>the > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>clients > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>for > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>the first time and for the second time. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>The sequence of steps I follow to see if two instances of > >>>>> > >>>>>the > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>program > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>communicate at cache level through JavaGroups are: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>1) I run a first instance of this test application > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.1) The thread of execution gets stopped on line 4 > >>>>> > >>>>>(first > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>instance). > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>The JavaGroups logging says -- A new member at address > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>'192.168.0.1:1590' > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>has joined the cluster > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>2) Then I run a second instance of the application > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.1) The thread of execution gets stopped on line 4 > >>>>> > >>>>>(second > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>instance). I > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>see on the console how the first instance is notified that > >>>>> > >>>>>the > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>second > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>instance has joined the cluster (JavaGroups logging -- A new > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>member > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>at > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>address '192.168.0.1:1593' has joined the cluster). > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.2) I obtain the collection of clients for the first > >>>>> > >>>>>time > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>on > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>first > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>instance, so all the object are cached. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.2) I obtain the collection of clients for the first > >>>>> > >>>>>time > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>on > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>second > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>instance. But objects are not retrieved from the cache > >>>>> > >>>>>(which is > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>supposed to > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>be shared with the first instance); instead they are cached > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>again > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>(as if > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>it > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>was a local cache for the instance). > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.3) I obtain again the collection of clients for the > >>>>> > >>>>>second > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>time on > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>first instance. Now the objects are retrieved from the cache > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>(but as > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>a > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>local > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>cache only available to the first instance) > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3) I obtain again the collection of clients for the > >>>>> > >>>>>second > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>time on > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>second instance. Now the objects are retrieved from the > >>>>> > >>>>>cache > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>(but > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>as a > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>local cache only available to the second instance). > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>So this is my simulation of a clustered environment with two > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>instances > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>of > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>the same test application. And of course I don't get the > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>behaviour I > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>expected to. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>Am i doing something worng? And I missunderstanding > >>>>> > >>>>>something? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>Can > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>this > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>kind > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>of test be done, as reflected on the documentation from OJB > >>>>> > >>>>>web? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>Patiently observing the console, it seems that on every > >>>>> > >>>>>instance > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>a > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>new > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>JavaGroups broadcasting listener is created: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>INFO [main] (Config.java:146) - Properties > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>{cache.algorithm=com.opensymphony.oscache.base.algorithm.LRUCache, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>cache.capacity=1000, cache.unlimited.disk=false, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>cache.event.listeners=com.opensymphony.oscache.plugins.clustersupport.JavaGroupsBroadcastingListener} > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>INFO [main] (GeneralCacheAdministrator.java:98) - > >>>>> > >>>>>Constructed > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>GeneralCacheAdministrator() > >>>>>>>>>>>>INFO [main] (GeneralCacheAdministrator.java:293) - Creating > >>>>> > >>>>>new > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>cache > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>INFO [main] (AbstractBroadcastingListener.java:35) - > >>>>>>>>>>>>AbstractBroadcastingListener registered > >>>>>>>>>>>>INFO [main] (JavaGroupsBroadcastingListener.java:91) - > >>>>> > >>>>>Starting > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>a > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>new > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>JavaGroups broadcasting listener with > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>properties=UDP(mcast_addr=231.12.21.132;mcast_port=45566;ip_ttl=32;mcast_send_buf_size=150000;mcast_recv_buf_size=80000):PING(timeout=2000;num_initial_members=3):MERGE2(min_interval=5000;max_interval=10000):FD_SOCK:VERIFY_SUSPECT(timeout=1500):pbcast.NAKACK(gc_lag=50;retransmit_timeout=300,600,1200,2400,4800):pbcast.STABLE(desired_avg_gossip=20000):UNICAST(timeout=5000):FRAG(frag_size=8096;down_thread=false;up_thread=false):pbcast.GMS(join_timeout=5000;join_retry_timeout=2000;shun=false;print_local_addr=true) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>GMS: address is 192.168.0.1:1590 > >>>>>>>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>INFO [main] (JavaGroupsBroadcastingListener.java:99) - > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>JavaGroups > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>clustering > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>support started successfully > >>>>>>>>>>>>INFO [PullPushAdapterThread] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>(JavaGroupsBroadcastingListener.java:166) - > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>A > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>new member at address '192.168.0.1:1590' has joined the > >>>>> > >>>>>cluster > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>so this can be maybe the problem ... But I confess I have no > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>idea > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>Thanks in advance, > >>>>>>>>>>>>Enrique Medina. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>_________________________________________________________________ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>Correos más divertidos con fotos y textos increíbles en MSN > >>>>> > >>>>>8. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>Pruébalo > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>gratis dos meses. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=es-es&XAPID=45&DI=1055 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>_________________________________________________________________ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Encuentra a tu media naranja entre los perfiles que más te > >>>>> > >>>>>gusten. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>Toda > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>la > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>magia del romance en MSN Amor & Amistad. http://match.msn.es/ > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>_________________________________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>¿Vas a comprar algo a través de Internet? Ordénalo por el mejor > >>>>> > >>>>>precio > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>en > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>MSN Compras. http://www.msn.es/compras/ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>_________________________________________________________________ > >>>>>>¿Estás pensando en cambiar de coche? Todas los modelos de serie y extras > >>>>> > >>>>>en > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>MSN Motor. http://motor.msn.es/researchcentre/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>_________________________________________________________________ > >>>>Una nueva forma de navegar. Descarga la Barra de Herramientas de MSN. > >>>>http://toolbar.msn.es/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
