Hi Ilias,
well I not for starting any flame wars. But if you think there should be a common, better FAQ list and the existing documentation is not enough - why don't you just start a FAQ-List and try to improve this project. As you already stated: this is open source and anyone who is interested can try to contribute ;-)
Tino
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Daniel Perry wrote: [moved down] >
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ilias Lazaridis Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter wrote: [moved down]
Ilias Lazaridis escreveu:
I've noticed several threads, which remained unanswered.
This could imply to visitors that the product OJB is death (or not yet alive)
!!!
!!!
[...]
To distinguish a project: - care about newcomers - accept their laziness/confusion, point them to the relevant resource - hopefully they remember this in future. - and act the same against new newcomers.
A few answers can keep a newcomer within the project.
Increased userbase.
[...]
> I think these comments would be fair for a commercial product, [...] - (comments)
My suggestions are very fair, even within the context of open source, which has become high competitive.
Every involved parties (Team, Contributors, Users) should be interested to increase the user-base of OJB.
Questions like "Recommended ObjectCache for ODMG" should be served immediately with a link, even if this question was raised several times.
So, creating an FAQ, where every (even non experienced) community member can point the 'lazy' newcomers to the relevant subsection, should be a major goal.
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
