Thank you, Armin, I think i'am gonna try to use OJB 1.0.4, and if it does not work i'll post details about my issue.
Jean-Yves 2006/2/21, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Jean-Yves, > > Jean-Yves Sironneau wrote: > > Hello, I have a few unrelated questions regarding OJB : > > > > - Is there a way to set the deferrable foreign key constraint setting > using > > OJB xdoclet module ? > > > > Assume no. But Tom have much more experience with xdoclet, so he can > give you a professional answer. > > > > - When i use anonymous foreign key in a relationship, it's working > perfectly > > for collections, but > > for simple reference to an object, i have to store the referenced object > and > > then store the object referencing > > it, otherwise the two objects are created in db but the foreign key id > is > > not set. > > I don't know about such an issue. But your question isn't detailed > (auto-xxx settings, sample code, metadata mapping), so it's not possible > to answer this. In generally anonymous FK should show same behavior as > normal FK fields. > > > > > > It's pretty hard to discover it because, when i retrieve the objects > they > > are ok even if the db foreign key is not set. It's > > just later, if i restart my application for example, that the referenced > > objects fields are null. > > > > So i have two questions : Do you think it's normal behaviour ? And how > can i > > force OJB to retrieve everything > > from database to be able to test this kind of possible issues ? > > > > It would be helpful if you can provide a test (source + mapping) to > reproduce the issue. > > > > By the way i'am using CVS version of OJB 1.1 approximately 2-3 months > ago > > and the ODMG API > > (which is really working fine except for that). > > The 1.x trunk isn't for production environments > > > > > - Is the code for OJB 1.1 located in the 1.0 SVN branch ? Because i > don't > > know if i better use > > OJB 1.0.4 (or future 1.0.5) or the version i got from CVS. > > SVN trunk is OJB 1.x (early alpha state). The OJB_1_0_RELEASE branch is > OJB 1.0.x (upcoming 1.0.5). > So it's recommended to use 1.0.4 or the OJB_1_0_RELEASE branch (run the > test suite to get an impression of current stability - this will show > open issues). > > regards, > Armin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
