hi phil,
we could return DynaBeans for ReportQueries instead of Object[].
i'm not sure if DynaBeans are useful for normal queries.
jakob
Armin Waibel wrote:
Hi Phil,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am interested in finding out more information about OJB's support of
the commons-beanutils package. Is it possible to configure OJB to
return instances of DynaBeans instead of instances of POJOs?
This is (currently) not possible.
This would greatly reduce the amount of code required to support our
persistence layer ... basically it would be reduced to ojb class
descriptors for each object. The persistence broker operations
getObjectByQuery for example would need to know what type of object I
am searching for (so it can look up the appropriate class descriptor),
but then it would return a DynaBean holding the marshalled object. Is
this possible? It would remove nearly all of my redundant persistence
layer code!
Sorry I never used DynaBeans. But I think this will not be trivial.
Could you give me hint how OJB should return DynaBeans instead of mapped
persistence capable objects?
regards,
Armin
Thanks,
Phil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
