Armin Waibel escribió:
> Jose Maria wrote:
>>> If this doesn't solve your problem, please let me know (then I will
>>> try to reproduce your problem with a test-case).
>> I've done that. Setting auto-update/delete to 'none'. But it still
>> fails.
>
> I setup a local test case using the classes and mapping from your
> first post. When I run this test against the latest from SVN
> OJB_1_0_RELEASE branch the test run without failure. So your problem
> should be fixed in next version of OJB (if possible try to run your
> test against latest version from SVN OJB_1_0_RELEASE branch).
>
> The only issue I detect is an illegal insert of object B while running
>
> tx.begin();
>
> // Create A and B objects and make persistent
> A a = new A();
> a.setId(new Integer(startId));
> a.setName("Ten");
> tx.lock(a, Transaction.WRITE);
> B b = new B();
> b.setId(a.getId());
> b.setDescription("Detail");
> a.getItems().add(b);
> tx.lock(b, Transaction.WRITE);
>
> // Delete A and B
> database.deletePersistent(a);
> database.deletePersistent(b);
>
> tx.commit();
>
> Seems that OJB detects the B object referenced by A and change the
> modification state to insert it (instead of ignoring it). Will fix
> this ASAP.
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
>
>>> By the way, in the example below the data will never be written to
>>> database, because you delete a and b before the first commit. Further
>>> it's recommended to use Database.makePersistent(...) to persist new
>>> objects.
>>> http://db.apache.org/ojb/docu/tutorials/odmg-tutorial.html#Persisting+New+Objects
>>>
>>>
>> Yes, I know. This is only a test that I'm doing to try to solve the
>> problem. Why I make a new object and then delete it? We have some
>> applications in which users can create objects but can also delete them
>> if they want. After some operations they save the changes.
>>
>> Thank you for the help.
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
Thank you very much. I'll get the SVN branch. Meanwhile, I'm using 1.0.3
in production again, so there is no hurry to keep it fixed.--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
