Hi, The numbering is really an odd thing. Many places are already cleaned up, but there are still some dark spots that still rely on this feature.
thanks for your patience, Thomas Gary A. Bartlett wrote: > The repository documentation includes the following note about the id > attribute of the field-descriptor element: > > "The id attribute must contain a unique number identifying the > decriptor. The numbers for the attributes of a class must correspond to the > order of columns in the mapped table." > > This second part about matching the order of the columns in the mapped table > seems a bit restrictive to me. I wonder is this something that is required > only for certain OJB queries? As a test I modified the id attributes in a > test table I am working on, such that the order did not match, and > everything still worked correctly. > > The reason this is important to me is that I plan to create the repository > file automatically and cannot necessarily ensure that I assign id values > that correspond to the order of the columns in the table. > > Any information is appreciated. > > Gary Bartlett > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
