Ah, good point.  Hadn't quite thought that one through.  Don't really
know what to say about that one.  Someone else, I think, will have to
address that.

-Jason


On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 13:17, Cornelius Keller wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> I ve read the Javadoc you posted well.
> 
> 
> Jason McKerr wrote:
> > This likely is not an OJB issue.  Either that or somewhere OJB is
> > iterating over and modifying a collection at the same time. The tw
> > should be split to prevent this from happening.
> 
> In my opinion exactly this could happen in the singlevm 
> PersitenceBrokerImpl if you have more then one Instance of it in the 
> same JVM. It iterates over Collections coming out of the metadata Layer 
> wich is accessable form every PB instance and due to this not thread-safe.
> 
> My Patch solved that Problem for me, I am not shure if it will do for 
> the Originator of this Thread, cause as I read now in his stacktrace he 
> used the ODMG api. But I posted it in case it is usefull.
> 
> 
> > Here's the javadoc for this issue.
> > 
> > 
>http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/api/java/util/ConcurrentModificationException.html
> > 
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to