I'm quite busy right now. Almost no time for coding... I'll let you know once I checked something into CVS.
cheers, Thomas Corey Klaasmeyer wrote: >>- fix NotSerializable Exceptions > > If this is related to NestableException not implementing Serializable, I > know that the commons-lang project has made this change, so a fix here > should be as easy as including the most recent version of commons-lang. > >>- make compression optional > > I need to make this change, and I would prefer do some useful work than give > in to base instinct and eviscerate -- unlike some superpowers that I am > familiar with. If you can check something in, or send me changes, I will be > happy to do this work. It will also give me head start finer grained cache > control and useServer on a repository basis... > >>- implement compression for all three servers (Socket, Server EJB) >>- implement all currently unimplemented PB methods for C/S mode >>- fix all other upcoming problems so that C/S mode runs again without >>fialures and errors. >>-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- >>Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Gesendet: Montag, 14. Oktober 2002 13:30 >>An: OJB Users List >>Betreff: Antwort: AW: proxy collections in client / server mode >> >> >>ok. for now, i will disable collection proxies, because >>without them, it >>seems to work. maybe you can specify what has to be done, so >>maybe i could >>do some fixes. >> >>juergen >> >> >> >>Hi J�rgen, >> >>If I remember correctly, I did a full regression test for the >>C/S mode >>with >>0.9.4. There had been no errors or failures then. (At that time proxy >>collectiosn were already integrated.) >> >>But since the 0.9.5 refactoring there are several problems >>with C/S mode. >>I'm currently working on a fix. Currently things look very >>ugly and I have >>no idea how long it will take to fix these issues. >> >>cheers, >>Thomas >> >> >>>-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- >>>Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Gesendet: Montag, 14. Oktober 2002 12:35 >>>An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Betreff: proxy collections in client / server mode >>> >>> >>>hi! >>>are proxy collections tested in client /server ? since we use >>>this feature >>>(proxy collections), we have lots of troubles on the server >>>side. i get >>>lots of NPE's in PersistenceBrokerImpl, e.g. calling method >>>close(), but >>>connectionManager is null. also in method >>> >>>private ManageableCollection getCollectionByQuery(Class >>>collectionClass, >>>Class itemClass, Query query) >>> throws ClassNotPersistenceCapableException, >>>PersistenceBrokerException >>>i got a npe because descriptorRepository is null. i did a logging >>>message, that was invoked when the PB isClosed(), and this >>>message was >>>printed. so is it legal, to do anything on a closed >>>PersistenceBroker? is >>>there a bug? >>> >>>juergen >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
