Hi, I agree, sounds excellent to me. Infact, we have had to do a number of workarounds in order to compensate this. In other words, just what we need....
Please re-analyse this Thomas! :-) Thanks for your time. Regards, Michael D. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Ochtrop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Child Collections matching an additional Criteria Hi, integrating that feature sounds great to me. I could definitly use it in our current project. Why would it not make sense to add it ? Michael -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Thimo K�nig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2002 12:42 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Child Collections matching an additional Criteria Hi, we are using OJB and did some changes to the PersistenceBrokerImpl to retrieve ChildCollections '#getChildCollectionByCriteria' with an additional Criteria. That means we are no able to retrieve only a subset of an relation. The complete integration of this feature needs some more changes e.g PersistenceBroker, PersistenceBrokerBean, PersistenceBrokerClient, RequestProcessor. I'm sure I forgot something. We've already discussed this with Thomas Mahler. He prefers to don't integrate it. But he also said that maybe he would change his mind if there is a serious demand. Because we need to integrate it anyway we'd like to here the opinion of the Developers and Users. No need to say that the integration would simplify upgrading to upcoming OJB versions for us. Awaiting your comments Thimo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
