Le ven 08/11/2002 � 08:29, Thomas Mahler a �crit : > Hi Kevin, > > Kevin Viet wrote: > > Another question about field mapping > > > > There are many implementation strategy for fields mapping, > > What are the main difference between them ... > > There are two reflection based strategies. > the default version cooperates with java access control mechanisms. It > is quite slow. > the maximum performance strategy also uses reflection, but does not care > about access control. It's the fastest field access. > > Then there are the Java beans compliant strategies. We have included > them into our distribution because users complaint that they don't want > any framework to access their objects directly. > disadvantages of java beans compliant access: > - it's not that fast. > - you have to stick to java beans naming conventions. > - you need public getters and setters for all persistent attributes. > > > > Is it better to take the one that follow java bean strategy or use the > > one which doesn't need accessors ?? > > > > It really depends on what is important to you, performance or java beans > compliance. > > cheers, > Thomas > > > Cheers > > > > > >
thx for your very usefull answer > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> -- Kevin Viet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ActiVia Networks -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
