Hi Thomas,
Doh!
Is there a way to overwrite the setting from
OJB.properties (DefaultImpl or PropertyImpl)
on a field by field basis? (I could not find
it in the DTD)
If not, would you be interested in an implementation
that does it? To use OJB effectively, I will need
this flexibility.
/rick.
"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of
a dog, it's too dark to read."
-- anon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Mahler [mailto:thma@;apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:28 PM
> To: OJB Users List
> Subject: Re: which attribute access behavior is correct?
>
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> this is very easy:
>
> OJB.properties determines which PersistentField implementation is used.
> 0.9.7 defaults to PersistentFieldPropertyImpl (getter/setter)
> CVS HEAD defaults to PersistentFieldDefaultImpl (direct field access)
>
> please check OJB.properties for details.
>
> cheers,
> Thomas
>
> "Ask not what I can do for you. Ask what you can do for me."
> - Jerry Seinfeld
>
> Rick Sanderson wrote:
> > Using 0.9.7, OJB was recognizing class fields by getter/setter only.
> > It would report an error when only a member existed, as follows:
> >
> > [org.apache.ojb.broker.accesslayer.JdbcAccess] ERROR:
> > PersistenceBrokerException
> > during the execution of materializeObject: Error creating
> PersistentField:
> > com.enservia.entour.product.Product, categoryID
> > Error creating PersistentField: com.enservia.entour.product.Product,
> > categoryID
> > java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
> > at
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
> > ...
> > Caused by: org.apache.ojb.broker.metadata.MetadataException: Can't find
> > property categoryID in com.enservia.entour.product.Product
> > at
> >
> org.apache.ojb.broker.metadata.PersistentFieldPropertyImpl.findPro
> pertyDescr
> > iptor(Unknown Source)
> > at
> >
> org.apache.ojb.broker.metadata.PersistentFieldPropertyImpl.<init>(Unknown
> > Source)
> > ... 16 more
> >
> > In my class Product, I do have a private (tried public) member called
> > categoryID.
> > If I add getter/setter, it works.
> >
> > I then updated to the source from cvs (version 0.9.8). The
> absolute reverse
> > is true.
> > OJB now only recognizes member variables in the class, and not
> > getters/setters.
> > When only getter/setters appear in the class, an error very
> similar to the
> > above results.
> >
> > As Seinfeld might say... What's up with that?
> >
> > Since I can find no other posts on the mailing lists on this
> subject, I fear
> > I have some kind of invalid setup, but I can't for the life of
> me figure out
> > what it is.
> >
> > /rick.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:ojb-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:ojb-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
