Re: commons-logging

[Eddie Bush]

Matthew Baird wrote:

look at the ojb.properties file:

#----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Logging
#----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# The LoggerClass entry tells OJB which concrete Logger
# implementation is to be used.
#
# Commons-logging
#LoggerClass=org.apache.ojb.broker.util.logging.CommonsLoggerImpl
# log4j based logging
#LoggerClass=org.apache.ojb.broker.util.logging.Log4jLoggerImpl
# OJB's own simple looging support
LoggerClass=org.apache.ojb.broker.util.logging.PoorMansLoggerImpl
LoggerConfigFile=log4j.properties


I think this functionality pre-dates commons-logging, although I may be wrong. I don't see any harm in making the commons stuff the default, anyone else object?

I figured that's why it was there, but I just had to ask.

If making commons-logging the default implementation enables me to use whichever logging implementation I specify in my commons-logging.properties, I think that would be really cool. I suspect it just changes the implementation used to one that is commons-logging compatible though. Wouldn't it be easier to just move over to utilizing commons-logging for everything - and let people choose from there which implementation they prefer?

Thanks for your timely responses! You must be camping the list, Matthew! ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:27 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: commons-logging


Oh? I didn't notice that - perhaps I missed it in the source? If that's the case I feel down-right stupid :-O

Wouldn't it be simpler to just use commons-logging period though? ... and not have to deal with any logging details inside of OJB?

Matthew Baird wrote:

OJB supports commmons logging, our own logging implementation, and log4j. What more could you ask for?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:23 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: commons-logging


I was just curious why OJB continues to use it's own home-brewed logging strategy over commons-logging. Anyone know? That's about the only thing I dislike about it - makes me deal with two different logging setups.

Thanks :-)

--
Eddie Bush




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>