On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 06:31, you wrote: > Hi all, > I have to develop a complex application and i'd like to build it with > Turbine, and I'm wondering what persistence layer is the best one > (maturity, stability, not worried about a complex data model) between > Torque and OJB ? I've also heard about Castor ... > Any feedbacks ? > Thank you a lot. > Richard.
Hi Richard, Most Turbine users currently use Torque for the persistance layer of their applications. I have been using Torque for a long time and can vouch for its maturity and stability. However, the design and implementation of Torque (ie: the underlying architecture and code) leaves a lot to be desired when compared with OJB. Developing an application using Torque/Peers is easy and can be done very quickly. However, OJB has many more advanced features and is much more flexible than Torque. See these posts for some information that might help you make a decision: http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=12062 http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=12067 http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=12068 Regards, -- Rodney -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
