yes you could do this, but it would be nicer, imho, to have this be part of the 
standard mapping. I've used it in Castor, and it's very effective.

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Gelhar, Wallace J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
        Sent: Thu 1/23/2003 8:10 AM 
        To: OJB Users List 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: Customizing if a persistente object use the cache or not
        
        

        Isn't this possible today by using a custom attribute and extending or
        rewriting the cache?
        
        Wally
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Jason McKerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:55 AM
        To: OJB Users List
        Subject: RE: Customizing if a persistente object use the cache or not
        
        
        Yup, that'd be cooler than an ice-cube sandwich.
        
        -Jason
        
        On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 07:49, Matthew Baird wrote:
        > I think even better than this would to be have a cache setting like
        > Castor does
        > 
        > cache="none|time-limited|count-limited|soft|jcs|custom"
        > capacity=""
        > 
        > m
        >
        >       -----Original Message-----
        >       From: Jason McKerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        >       Sent: Thu 1/23/2003 7:47 AM
        >       To: OJB Users List
        >       Cc:
        >       Subject: Re: Customizing if a persistente object use the cache
        or not
        >      
        >      
        >
        >       I agree this could be a very useful feature if it's possible.
        >      
        >       -jason
        >      
        >       On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 07:34, CLARAMONTE Jean-Baptiste wrote:
        >       > Hello,
        >       >
        >       > I would like to know if there is a way to customize for each
        object if it
        >       > can or can't be in cache ?
        >       > Do you think it could be easy to add this functionality so
        that it could be
        >       > added in the respository, like this for example :
        >       >
        >       >    <class-descriptor
        >       >         class="Customer"
        >       >         table="CUSTOMER"
        >       >         in-cache="false">
        >       > ...
        >       >    </class-descriptor>
        >       >
        >       >
        >       > Like that you could customize which class need to always be up
        to date
        >       > compared to the database and which just need to be loaded one
        time (static
        >       > data).
        >       >
        >       >
        >       > thanks for your opinion on the subject
        >       >
        >       > JB
        >      
        >      
        >       --
        >       To unsubscribe, e-mail:
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        >       For additional commands, e-mail:
        > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        >      
        >      
        >
        >
        > ______________________________________________________________________
        >
        > --
        > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        > For additional commands, e-mail:
        > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        
        
        --
        To unsubscribe, e-mail:
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        For additional commands, e-mail:
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        
        
        --
        To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        
        

<<winmail.dat>>

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Reply via email to