Hi, Does anyone know if OJB is *supposed* to support caching at this level? Or do we need to commit the transaction before attempting to find the object again?
Thanks, Dan On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:41:17 -0700, "Bill Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi, > > I am working on a project that is using OJB checked out from CVS at > jakarta.apache.org and have been having a good amount of success (thanks > to > the OJB developers for their work). But I am running into an issue with > 'dirty-reads'. > > My understanding is that if in the repository.xml file I have > isolation-level="read-uncommitted" set then I can do the following: > > 1) start a transaction (using ODMG) > 2) create a new object > 3) lock the object (with lock mode of WRITE) > 4) work with other objects > 5) use a finder to select the newly created object (created in step #2) > using non-primary key fields > 6) update the object (found in step #5) > 7) commit the transaction > > The issue that I have is that in step #5 when I try to find the newly > created object, I do not find it. I have checked the mail archives but > have > not run across something that would help me. > > Is anyone else having this issue? Is there some configuration that I > have > missed? > > Any input would be appreciated. > > Bill > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- http://fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
