Greg London wrote: > If there were a definition for Open Hardware, > it would be something like: > > A design, usually in the form of some copyrightable work, > which describes a physical object in sufficient detail that > the device can be constructed from the design.
Do people generally agree that a brief statement like this (for 'hardware') coupled with the Open Knowledge Definition (for 'open', see opendefinition.org) could constitute a definition for open hardware? Is there any other angle we'd like to cover? Jonathan _______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
