Hi, >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> Rufus Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <http://www.opendefinition.org/osd/> > I'd also welcome comments on 2 specific issues: > 1. Naming: should it be Free/Open Service Definition or just plain > Open Service Definition? > 2. URL: should we go for the short 'osd' or the longer > 'open_service_definition' (or even just 'open_service' or > 'free_open_service'). I think there have been already too many "OSD" acronyms -- especially, for the Open *Source* Definition. Isn't it a good idea to change the name/URL before it become too popular, to avoid confusion in the future? Unfortunately, I don't come up with any good candidates -- possibly, OSSD(means the Open SaaS Definition)? I know it sounds rather bad and/or stupid ;-) Best regards, MH -- Masayuki Hatta Graduate School of Economics, The University of Tokyo http://www.mhatta.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
