Great thanks all! I will produce a new version in light of comments ASAP. Rufus: I was wondering, perhaps radically, whether for the sake of parsimony we could lose distinction between apps/content on the one hand and tools on the other? E.g. in case of WDMMG / Open Spending or Open Shakespeare we are serving up open material with tools/websites that can be used to explore this - and nearly all our web apps/services can be considered tools in some broader sense? What do you think?
J. On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jason Kitcat <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 22 March 2011 17:40, Jonathan Gray <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Then I tried to capture these two main ideas in logos for 'tools' and >>> 'communities' based on the colourful bubbles that seems to be becoming >>> our house style. I created a basic flyer out of this: >>> >>> Front: http://www.flickr.com/photos/okfn/5550671746/ >>> Back: http://www.flickr.com/photos/okfn/5550671744/ > > I like these a lot. > > However, if someone doesn't know about OKF then they are unlikely to know > what an "open knowledge commons" is. How about "open knowledge culture" or > "open knowledge society"? > > Minor point, but I think it's much cleaner to put "To find out more visit > okfn.org" and lose the final full stop after the email address. > > All the best, > Jason > > > -- > Jason Kitcat > Project Co-ordinator > The Open Knowledge Foundation > > +44 (0) 7956 886 508 > > http://www.okfn.org > http://twitter.com/jasonkitcat > > > _______________________________________________ > okfn-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss > -- Jonathan Gray Community Coordinator The Open Knowledge Foundation http://blog.okfn.org http://twitter.com/jwyg http://identi.ca/jwyg _______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
