Peter MR, I have some data and links in this article from last summer. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/07-02-11.htm#copyright
Here's the key excerpt (from #9): When I checked last week (June 24, 2011), 1,448 out of 6,647 journals in > the DOAJ, or 21.8%, used some kind of CC license. http://www.doaj.org/?func=licensedJournals > As of the same date, 747 or 11.2% had the SPARC Europe Seal of Approval, > which requires CC-BY. > http://www.doaj.org/?func=sealedJournals > OA repositories are rarely in a position to obtain the permissions needed > for libre OA. Hence, we can't criticize or complain when most of their > deposits are gratis, not libre. But OA journals can easily obtain the > permissions needed for libre OA. When they don't offer libre OA, they have > no excuse. This is one of the largest missed opportunities of the OA > movement to date. > http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/10-02-09.htm#2 > Today most libre OA is gold OA. But unfortunately it's not yet the case > that most gold OA is libre OA, and unfortunately it's not even close. Best, Peter S. Peter Suber bit.ly/suber-gplus On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Peter Murray-Rust <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Gael Varoquaux < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0000, Rob Myers wrote: >> >> >> > The GPL is the most widely used Free Software licence. >> >> It is going down: >> http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/files/gplusage.png >> >> > Thanks - very useful. > > It would be useful to have similar (real) figures about Green Gold, libre > etc in Open Access and not simply statements of hope > > P. > > Gael >> >> _______________________________________________ >> okfn-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss >> > > > > -- > Peter Murray-Rust > Reader in Molecular Informatics > Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry > University of Cambridge > CB2 1EW, UK > +44-1223-763069 > > _______________________________________________ > okfn-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
