Hey all, just received an email from Andrew saying that more then 50 orgs signed for the Declaration. Cool :)
The OKFN appears a few times (both as Germany and UK). Do you think it's worthy signing it as OKFN-Br as well? We've been participating a lot on those discussions, so I would think it makes sense. But then again don't know if it's worthy having every local chapter signing it separately? []'s Pedro Markun On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Daniel Dietrich <daniel.dietr...@okfn.org>wrote: > Hi all, > > I suggest we go ahead and sign the Declaration on Parliamentary Openness > as nobody opposed. > > All the best > Daniel > > On 14 Jul 2012, at 20:04, Daniel Dietrich wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to suggest the OKFN to sign the Declaration on > Parliamentary Openness: > > http://www.openingparliament.org/declaration > > > > The declaration is currently in draft modus awaiting comments here: > > http://publicmarkup.org/bill/opening-parliament-declaration/ > > > > The Declaration will be publicly announced on 15 September at the > "International Day of Democracy", at the World e-Parliament Conference 2012 > in Rom, see: http://www.ictparliament.org/ > > > > Interesting for some people at the OKFN is the proposed technical > collaboration around PMO sites using a shared technology stack. Discussion > about this will take place at: transparency-t...@googlegroups.com > > > > What do people think? > > > > All best > > Daniel > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > okfn-discuss mailing list > okfn-discuss@lists.okfn.org > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss >
_______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list okfn-discuss@lists.okfn.org http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss