FYI German constitutional judge expresses concerns about the “right to be forgotten” decision ( http://policyreview.info/articles/news/german-constitutional-judge-expresses-concerns-about-right-be-forgotten-decision/315 )
On 24 July 2014 09:26, Sally Deffor <[email protected]> wrote: > Media publishers seem to be benefiting from the Google ECJ ruling by > adopting new tactics > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/22/right-to-be-forgotten-google-publishers-uk_n_5610803.html > > Sally > > > On 11 July 2014 14:31, Sally Deffor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There have been quite interesting (strategic) responses so far from >> Google since the ruling, but I have to say I didn't see this one coming. >> Quite unlike it to open itself up to public involvement it this manner. >> >> Sally >> >> >> On 11 July 2014 12:00, Lancelot PECQUET <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> I understand that the European Commission is indeed thinking >>> <http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/index_en.htm> >>> (with their usual "suggestors") about >>> a European standard regulation that could possibly overrule members >>> state regulations. >>> >>> Will it be the least common multiple or the greatest common denominator >>> of national regulations ? >>> Imho, I doubt all UE countries will agree (or have resources) to >>> reinforce controls and enforce higher >>> standards... >>> >>> Pierre raises an opengov question regarding transparency and civil >>> society participation at the EU level >>> and, of course, I definitely agree with him. >>> >>> Lancelot >>> >>> Le 11/07/2014 12:03, Pierre Chrzanowski a écrit : >>> >>> Hi Puneet, I actually think Google is handling the case quite well to >>> their profit so far. >>> >>> The irony to me is that thanks to a not very well though ruling from >>> the ECJ, Google is now setting up a consultative decision-making process >>> that could end with a legal framework on its own, coordinated by a private >>> global entity, that substitutes to national regulators and rules on what is >>> public information and what is not. Where are the Data Protection and Right >>> to Info authorities here ? Will they have the capacity to handle and >>> control all decisions made by Google on a case by case basis ? >>> >>> I find the question raised by Google of high importance and I am keen >>> to think and discuss about it but I would have really really preferred that >>> question being raised by my National or European Parliament and being >>> discussed through a democratic process. Instead of that, we are now in a >>> strange situation where we are offered to go into a consultative process >>> and provide our knowledge and reflection on a matter of public interest to >>> an entity we do not have control over but who is asked, obliged, to >>> regulate that public matter. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:58 AM, stef <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:39:14AM +0200, Pierre Chrzanowski wrote: >>>> > So now, as expected, we have a private entity, kindly seeking public >>>> advice >>>> > from an Advisory Council, to regulate on a case by case basis on what >>>> is >>>> > public information and what is not. I would say there is some irony in >>>> > there. >>>> >>>> i think google did everything to maneuver itself into this gatekeeper >>>> position. >>>> >>>> 2004, don't be evil >>>> 2014, we changed policy >>>> >>>> -- >>>> otr fp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/otr.txt >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Pierre Chrzanowski* >>> *Expert Open Data* >>> >>> Mail : [email protected] >>> Skype : pierre.chrzanowski | Twitter : @pzwsk >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mydata-open-data mailing >>> [email protected]https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/mydata-open-data >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mydata-open-data mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/mydata-open-data >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> *Sally DefforOpen Data & Privacy Project Coordinator | >> skype:deffor.selase | @SDeffor | +44 (0)7774 734206 >> <%2B44%20%280%297774%20734206> The **Open Knowledge Foundation* >> <http://okfn.org/> >> >> *Empowering through Open Knowledge**http://www.okfn.org* >> <http://www.okfn.org/>* | **@okfn* <https://twitter.com/OKFN>* | **OKF >> on Facebook* <http://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork>* | **Blog* >> <http://blog.okfn.org/>* | **Newsletter <http://okfn.org/?s=Newsletter>* >> >> *Have you bought your tickets <http://2014.okfestival.org/tickets/> to >> OKFestival yet? Join us in Berlin in July (15-17)!* >> *See you at OKFestival <http://2014.okfestival.org/> 15-17 July 2014* >> > > > > -- > > > *Sally DefforOpen Data & Privacy Project Coordinator | skype:deffor.selase > | @SDeffor | +44 (0)7774 734206 <%2B44%20%280%297774%20734206> The **Open > Knowledge Foundation* <http://okfn.org/> > > *Empowering through Open Knowledge**http://www.okfn.org* > <http://www.okfn.org/>* | **@okfn* <https://twitter.com/OKFN>* | **OKF on > Facebook* <http://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork>* | **Blog* > <http://blog.okfn.org/>* | **Newsletter <http://okfn.org/?s=Newsletter>* > > -- *Sally DefforOpen Data & Privacy Project Coordinator | skype:deffor.selase | @SDeffor | +44 (0)7774 734206 The **Open Knowledge Foundation* <http://okfn.org/> *Empowering through Open Knowledge**http://www.okfn.org* <http://www.okfn.org/>* | **@okfn* <https://twitter.com/OKFN>* | **OKF on Facebook* <http://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork>* | **Blog* <http://blog.okfn.org/>* | **Newsletter <http://okfn.org/?s=Newsletter>*
_______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
