-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102453/#review6109
-----------------------------------------------------------


Personally i do not like this kind of change because i've been already bit by 
Laurent blindly changing some code in KTuberling to "fix" this and the code 
stopping to work.

I am not going to make the silly effort to make sure you do not break anything, 
so you have three options:
 * Commit it, and i case you break something take all my love
 * Do not commit it and wait for Laurent to do it, so he will take my love 
instead of me when something breaks
 * Live without the 0.0000000000000000000000000001% speed increase

Your choice.

- Albert


On Aug. 27, 2011, 11:57 a.m., Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102453/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 27, 2011, 11:57 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Or: flood code with QLatin1String/QLatin1Char
> 
> Interested in such patches? Would do more to the other files if you welcome 
> these changes.
> Have not done any measurements if this brings real advantages, but some 
> ยต-improvements should be there by theory.
> 
> Style okay? Or should resulting very long lines be broken? And should there 
> be spaces between '('/')' and '"' ?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/document.cpp a417828 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102453/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Could still load and navigate a PDF with a toc.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Friedrich W. H.
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Reply via email to