https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301774
Till Schäfer <till2.schae...@uni-dortmund.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |till2.schaefer@uni-dortmund | |.de --- Comment #2 from Till Schäfer <till2.schae...@uni-dortmund.de> --- i write the same down here what i wrote in the implemtation bug of the annotation storing feature # 151614 . It is very unintuitive that you have to do "save as" for storing annotations. i could understand that the file should not be modified without an extra save action, but why isnt there a simple save option? An example: when i like to add a comment to a new pdf i have to click "save as", than "save" (in the file selction dialog) and confirm the override waning. some time later i try to modify something. That leads to the question if i like to store the annotations. Again there is no "save", but only "save as". At this point it is getting totally unintuitive. I have never seen such a dialog before whith only save as and no simple save as confirmation. So it aks me if i like to save the annotations, i select "save as", than "save" in the file selection dialog, again confirm the overwriting of the file. This is unnescesary confusing. simply introduce save and everything will be much more consistent. This makes me feel like always working with write protected files. The many hints in the form of dialogs that appear to explain the behaviour to the user, are a symptom of not consistent workflow. would be nice to see this corrected. Then this feature is awsome and very usable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel