> On April 4, 2013, 6:19 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Azat you still interested in working on this?
> 
> Azat Khuzhin wrote:
>     Yes, I will try to look at this weekend.
>     I don't have enough time for this at weekdays.
> 
> Azat Khuzhin wrote:
>     Sorry for such a long delay, I have the time for that now.
>     On it.
> 
> Azat Khuzhin wrote:
>     Albert, Eike, Thanks for ideas!
>     
>     For now I have _dirty_ patch that implement this in per-backend options.
>     
>     But here is the thing:
>     We can't just return QWidget with general properties,
>     because we want to restore settings for every backend separately,
>     and we can't do this in current scheme, because this QWidget contain 
> elements with one objectName(),
>     while we need to change it for backend.
>     
>     I think even if we do this, this is not transparent.
>     Also we must generate "*.kcfg[c]" to {re,}store it.
>     
>     Maybe I misunderstood something?
>     Any thoughts?

Well, we don't really need a kcfg, we just need a KConfigSkeleton that can be 
generated by code, and you don't really need to modify the objectName, so maybe 
what we need is something that returns both a QWidget with the default stuff 
(but you can still add stuff if you want) and a KConfigSkeleton with the 
default stuff (but you can still add stuff if you want). To create the 
KConfigSkeleton you need a "configname" that you can probably use from the 
KAboutData that GeneratorInfo is storing in document.

May be a bit tricky, but "should work" (TM)


- Albert


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109021/#review30393
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 23, 2013, 11:56 a.m., Azat Khuzhin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109021/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 23, 2013, 11:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular, Albert Astals Cid and Eike Hein.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Development history:
> https://github.com/azat/okular/compare/master...font-selector-for-plain-text-formats
> 
> Link to thread from mailing list:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.okular/13279
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   conf/dlggeneralbase.ui f2c9efd 
>   conf/okular_core.kcfg 054b5c1 
>   core/textdocumentgenerator.h dd75c5c 
>   core/textdocumentgenerator.cpp f370ded 
>   core/textdocumentgenerator_p.h 749d6f2 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109021/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested manually
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Azat Khuzhin
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Reply via email to