rkflx added a comment.
For me it's about signalling what the submitter want's to be done with the review: - no reviewer: no review wanted, it's more like a WIP - group reviewer (could automatically default to https://phabricator.kde.org/tag/okular/): everybody interested should review - explicit reviewer: special expertise wanted As for the `okular-devel`: I'm interested in all of KDE's projects, but I won't and can't subscribe to every single mailinglist out there (I may look at the list archive occasionally when I'm focussing on an application like in the last weeks). If you want your reviewers coming mainly from the mailing list, I guess you have enough reviewers already (didn't look like it to me, though). Anyway, it's not for me to interfere with the inner workings of the Okular project, this was merely a suggestion with only the best intentions in mind. REPOSITORY R223 Okular REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D7874 To: aacid, rkflx Cc: ltoscano, ngraham, rkflx, tobiasdeiminger, #okular, aacid
