https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408222
--- Comment #10 from David Hurka <david.hu...@mailbox.org> --- Created attachment 120580 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=120580&action=edit Pixels Using Albert’s screenshot, one could say that Evince and Okular draw slightly different. Indeed, where the arrow points, Evince is sharper than Okular, resulting in a higher contrast and a differently perceived black tone. Could have these reasons: a) Both have a slightly different alignment of the scanned image, resulting in different sampling of rendered pixels which are not exactly on image pixels. b) Both have same alignment, but use different filtering. (Bilinear, Bicubic, Nearest Neighbour,... In fact, Okular does not use nearest neighbour, causing smeared edges on scans. Maybe Evince does?) c) this happened just at random for exactly these zoom factors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
