https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488497

--- Comment #6 from Sune Vuorela <k...@pusling.com> ---
(In reply to Sune Vuorela from comment #5)
> > Also, should QT/MD4C Markdown renderer be implemented as the new and only
> > markdown backend, or should it be optional and offered as an alternative
> > backend to Discount in the [configuration
> > window](https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/okular/okular/configure-backends.
> > html)? 
> 
> I think a first approximation would be to just replace the current one.

Please also note that we at some point need to evaluate if the change is worth
it, but it is probably easier to do if we have a working implementation.

We will likely get some bugs and features swapped out for another set of bugs
and features by doing this.

After all, our current users have probably gotten used to the current bugs and
(mis)features.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to