Hi, For what it's worth, we talked just this morning about separating out publisher series/imprints :)
Sarah - thanks for clearing out those redundant unknowns too. Makes good sense to me. Cheers, george On 12/3/10 2:01 PM, Sarah Breau wrote: > Apple Paperbacks is, I believe, an imprint of Scholastic (more info on > imprints > here <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imprint>). When I come across these, I put > "An Apple Paperback" in the notes field, since the imprint is not properly a > series (like "Harry Potter #4", for example). I think OL should have a > separate > field for publisher's imprints, since it is not otherwise clear where this > info > should go. Although it's not clear to me how this information would be useful > to > anyone? Anyway, I put it in the notes field. > > I never add the format from an error elsewhere in the record. However, Amazon > almost always lists the format, so you can check there. In this case, I would > feel confident adding "Paperback" to the format field since Scholastic does > not > publish Apple Paperback books in hardcover editions. I don't think "unknown" > in > the format field is useful information; wherever I am not sure what the > correct > data is I leave it blank, and if a record lists "unknown" in the format field > I > remove the data. > > Sarah > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ol-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-discuss > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] _______________________________________________ Ol-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-discuss To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
