It just occurred to me that there is a new Wikipedia widget maker for
inserting widgets linking to Wikipedia and using brief summaries of articles
at http://toolserver.org/~magnus/widget/index.html?article=Tell%20England .
Maybe this would be useful?

Alex

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Alex Stinson <[email protected]>wrote:

> I agree with Roger. However, there might be the option of automatically
> porting the Wikipedia data like they have begun doing with Facebook with
> some sort of widget or template.
>
> For those of you who find that their aren't links coming back from
> Wikipedia to Open Library, I added the link for Tell England on the
> Wikipedia article in the following edit
> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tell_England&diff=437059278&oldid=431133226.
> It is basically the same process with authors, except using OL author.
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Roger Loran Bailey <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The link to Wikipedia might be advantageous, but I think that some kind of
>> description should be in the Open Library entry too. That is, the
>> Wikipedia
>> link should not substitute for the description, only augment it.
>>
>>
>> _     _      _
>>
>> "The time to speak the truth has come.... The government of the United
>> States cannot be on the side of peasants because it is an ally of the
>> landowners. It cannot be on the side of workers anywhere in the world
>> because it is an ally of the monopolies. It cannot be on the side of
>> colonies because it is an ally of the colonizing powers." - Fidel Castro
>> 1960
>>
>>
>> Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/rogerbailey81
>>
>>
>> The Militant:
>>  http://www.themilitant.com
>> Pathfinder Press:
>>  http://www.pathfinderpress.com
>> Granma International:
>>  http://www.granma.cu/ingles/index.html
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "neville holmes" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 3:00 AM
>> Subject: Re: [ol-discuss] Ol-discuss Digest, Vol 47, Issue 11
>>
>>
>> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 Alex Stinson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> There is not problem in using the Lead or some
>> >> other part of a Wikipedia article in the OL entry.
>> >> However remember that Wikipedia is released under
>> >> a CC-BY-SA licenses so if you do use the Wikipedia
>> >> content make sure that you leave attribution at
>> >> the end of the quoted material. ...
>> >
>> > What I had in mind was not quoting from Wikipedia,
>> > but linking to it.  Like <a
>> > href=http://openlibrary.org/authors/OL136518A>this</a>.
>> > I shouldn't think this would need attribution.  Note
>> > that Wikipedia also features works, like
>> > <a href=http://openlibrary.org/works/OL1340645W>this</a>.
>> >
>> > In that way the Wikipedia crowd would manage the
>> > descriptive data and OL would manage the book content
>> > and the bibliographic data.  And of course enthusiasts
>> > could work in both groups.  This partnership could
>> > be formal, with Wikipedia linking to OL whenever OL
>> > linked to Wikipedia, and vice versa.
>> >
>> > These ideas coming from one who is a distant observer
>> > in library matters and a minor collector of old books,
>> >
>> > Neville Holmes
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ol-discuss mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-discuss
>> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to
>> > [email protected]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ol-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-discuss
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ol-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-discuss
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to 
[email protected]

Reply via email to