Not in OL, I wouldn't think. There is the whole "anthologies" issue that has FRBR-thinkers tying their brains in knots - where a book is published with multiple works inside, and each of those works gets a work record. But OL simply treats the book itself, regardless of how many theoretical works it may contain, as representing a single work.
I'm worried that many of the links in OL, whether between works and editions, or authors and works, or variant forms of author names, seem to be in error. And this is a difficult kind of error to correct. Or, with my most optimistic hat on, is it not? I'd love to hear such good news. kc On 10/9/13 11:37 AM, Tom Morris wrote: > This edition http://openlibrary.org/books/OL23070031M.json is linked to > two separate works : > > http://openlibrary.org/works/OL5750935W/Cardcaptor_Sakura_Volume_5 > http://openlibrary.org/works/OL5750773W/Cardcaptor_Sakura_Volume_5 > > Is this ever legal? On the surface it doesn't seem like it should be > and it's probably also a sign that the two works need to be merged. > > Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > Ol-discuss mailing list - Ol-discuss@archive.org > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-discuss > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ol-discuss@archive.org/ > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > ol-discuss-unsubscr...@archive.org > -- Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet _______________________________________________ Ol-discuss mailing list - Ol-discuss@archive.org http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-discuss Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ol-discuss@archive.org/ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to ol-discuss-unsubscr...@archive.org
