Quoting Jonathan Rochkind <[email protected]>:
> Assuming OL _knows_ that a person as a subject is related to the > person-as-person (or is that person-as-author?). If the OL database > doesn't 'know' this, then there aren't really any options anyway. > If it does, I think it's fine to have them be different instances > of different entities, so long as they are related by an > appropriate relation. The issue is/was that OL did not maintain any commonality of identity between the 100 and 600 fields, as Edward's email earlier today explained. However, that can be retrieved, and then the result should be pretty much the same as what happens in MARC, which is that the entity is the same, but it has a different relationship to the bibliographic item being described (subject v. author). kc > > Jonathan > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Karen Coyle [[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:51 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ol-tech] Author RDF for testing > > Quoting Erik Hetzner <[email protected]>: > > >> In other words, we have a Person (e.g., [2]), a Person as >> bibliographic entity (as in FRBR), and finally one or more >> bibliographic records about the person, (e.g., [1]). Do I have that >> right? > > I was looking at it that way, in particular because the OL gives > subject/person a different ID from author. But then George popped in > saying that it would be good for authors and subjects to be the same > thing, presumably a person, and since she's the project lead... well, > "make it so." So I'm coding authors as foaf:persons since that appears > to be the desired direction for OL. > > In general, I consider metadata identifiers to identify the metadata, > not what the metadata is about, but that's my personal bias and > clearly others feel differently. In my world view, people do not have > identifiers, but information about people does. Of course, I live in > the city named for Bishop Berkeley, the philosopher whose theories can > be summarized as "there is no reality, get over it." :-) > > kc > -- > Karen Coyle > [email protected] http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] > -- Karen Coyle [email protected] http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
