I think I will use zones to have multiple agents on the same machine. With 2000 users spread over 3 agents on 3 machines, the load on the target is only 40%. By putting several agents on zones I should be able to scale up without hitting that limit.
Thanks, Brian Akara Sucharitakul wrote: > We are looking at some possible memory leaks, but cannot yet isolate > them whether these are Faban issues, our workload driver issues, or > some library issues. Not even sure they are memory leaks just yet. > > Based on experience with this workload, I'd suggest running up to ~700 > concurrent users per agent if you're running the agents in a 32 bit > address space. Just increase the number of agents. At 1500 concurrent > users, I suggest 3 agents (although you may be able to survive with > 2). The load will be evenly distributed among agents. > > -Akara > > Brian Overstreet wrote: >> With the current architecture of Faban and Olio, are there any known >> limits on the number of concurrent users? When I scale the number of >> users up to 1500 per agent, the JVM running the agent crashes. I was >> wondering if other people have had higher numbers per agent. This might >> be more relevant to the faban list, but I'll start here. >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Brian >
