I'm happy :3 But if you still want "freez" you can disable publication.
2013/11/10 Robert Xu <[email protected]> > > On Nov 9, 2013 3:53 PM, "Crispin Boylan" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 09/11/13 20:48, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> given everyone has been ignoring the freeze anyway and Cooker is > already totally unusable, I'd say we may as well officially un-freeze > Cooker (that, or ban almost everyone for ignoring the freeze ;) )... > >> > >> What do others think? > >> > >> ttyl > >> bero > >> > >> > > happy with that. > > > > i think it would be better if next time we freeze for a period, then > branch for release and unfreeze cooker simultaneously. i'm not sure the > extended 'freeze' has helped us any this time. > > > > having said that, it would be nice to actually be able to enforce the > freeze! > > > > Well, Publication without QA could be turned off... > > > >
