@Ben Yes. @All Every good improvement achieving the purpose of the basic idea (if agreed) is welcome. Il 14/gen/2016 08:22, "Robert Xu" <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> In a way, this concept is akin to nightlies (which, by the way, are > being built at https://nightly.rxu.io/ (though the latest ones are > failing...)). > > Maybe we should have a pipeline where we promote builds based on > nightlies. Dates will also help us make sure that the numbers are > increasing (and also mean something). Then, we can say something like > "we consider build 20160101 beta quality" and release it as is. > > It might be easier to manage that way. > > On 13 January 2016 at 21:42, Ben Bullard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good idea. If I understand instead of calling an .iso Alpha or Beta > instead > > name it dev-rel and then we testers refer to it by "dev-rel <build ID #>" > > like this dev-rel 14025? Then Alpha and Beta releases are public and > > official releases only? > > > > Ben Bullard > > ben79 > > -------------------- > > OpenMandriva-QA Team > > > > On 01/13/2016 01:39 PM, rugyada wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Resurrecting an old idea of mine, previously just sketched and never > > officially submitted, I'd like to propose the following: > > > > Currently during all the development time, ISOs are being named Alpha > > / Beta / aso. > > For some people, maybe bit more properly but imho not really correct > > or widely/commonly decided/agreed, are being called pre-Alpha / > > pre-Beta / aso. > > > > This way, it happens that ISOs built *along the path* which leads to > > Alpha, Beta, etc. are not yet A/B/etc actually. > > > > This preamble in order to explain the "problem" and submitting > > possible "solution". > > > > Suggestion is to name the WIP ISO builds (pre-* ) as > > Development Release - short name: dev-rel - acronym: DR > > > > So I can say for example: "I'm testing dev-rel 14025" or "I've > > installed DR 14025 iso" or "Call for testing dev-rel 14025 for bug > > hunting" > > > > The point is not to release ISOs named Beta untill they not soddisfy > > the Beta standards (Beta, here just as an example) > > > > ISOs might be named > > OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-dev-rel-PLASMA.x86_64.iso > > instead of > > OpenMandrivaLx.2015.0-beta-PLASMA.x86_64.iso > > > > Finally, when dev-rels will reach the requested standards, we can > > release the official Alpha, Beta, etc release for public download. > > > > Just an idea, hopefully you may have some time to consider it. > > Thank you for your attention. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OM-QA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org > > > > > > -- > cheers, Robert :: github.com/robxu9 > > _______________________________________________ > OM-QA mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org >
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
