Here .iso # 350 is a GO.
Are we there yet?
Ben Bullard
ben79
--------------------
OpenMandriva-QA Team
On 06/17/2016 01:16 PM, Colin Close wrote:
I think it's getting to the point where we need to draw a mark in the sand.
I would suggest that if the OM Welcome is not sorted out by tomorrow evening we
go with what we have as BETA2.
We can always cover the issue in the Release Notes.
Perhaps then we can make a proper timetable for the RC and what if anything
should updated in the then current BETA.
A period on minimal changes is needed so that overall stability can be assessed
as well as collecting together
any bugs that may be reported outside of the QA realm.
It's very difficult to chase a moving target and gain any meaningful test
results.
Thoughts..Suggestions?
Colin
On Friday, 17 June 2016 19:00:35 BST Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
On 2016-06-17 18:37, Ben Bullard wrote:
Is .iso # 342 sufficiently tested and OK for a release for Beta2?
om-welcome isn't working. We have a "fix", but are still looking at a
proper solution (one that doesn't involve pulling in the whole python 2
stack as dependencies).
Unfortunately my initial fix for that is only partially working.
ttyl
bero
_______________________________________________
OM-QA mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org
_______________________________________________
OM-QA mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
