From the link you gave, I see this sentence: "Er sieht die Rolle des Paketbetreuers als zentrales Kontrollelement für den Erfolg freier Software und befürchtet, dass die neuen Formate vor allem schlechte Entwickler belohnen würden" "He sees the role of the package maintainer as a central control element for the success of free software and is concerned that the new formats would reward especially bad developer"
If this translation is correct, I guess it's urgent to wait :) 2016-06-26 23:36 GMT+02:00 Ben Bullard <[email protected]>: > Maybe we should adopt Ubuntu and fix it.:-P > > Ye Olde Curmudgeon > Ben Bullard > ben79 > -------------------- > OpenMandriva-QA Team > > On 06/26/2016 04:17 PM, Maik Wagner wrote: > > Dear Cookers, > > I noticed a couple of discussions on the German Linux News Sites such as > heise.de or pro-linux.de that package management is apparently changing. > Instead of the rpm/yum or dpkg/apt-get discussions there seem to be some new > contenders: Snappy, Flatpack, AppImage etc. > > http://www.heise.de/ix/meldung/Richtungswechsel-Diskussion-um-neue-Linux-Paketformate-3244636.html > > Might adopting one of these be beneficial? > > Have a good week, > > > Maik > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org > _______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
