Two questions: -- currently we have 4 repositories; this number will increase for each new release, according to the current model; the proposed changes will keep 4 repositories forever, as there will not be "new" release. So, at start, the benefit, in terms of space required, is not that important. Is that correct?
-- imagine we are, let's say ten years in the future: "Legacy" (=2013) is still the same? "LTS" evolves "slowly" and still features kde4? "Stable" features "plasmic13" (the evolution of kde project in ten years) "Cooker" is still cooking I guess there will be a kind of shift and old releases will have to be abandoned and we should adopt, from the beginning, a rule for that. 2016-06-30 16:06 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Gajc <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > i'd like to share with you an idea that was presented by me on OMA meeting > in Krakow 2015. Idea was warmly welcomed by attendants of that meeting :) > > https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/Pseudo_rolling_release_model > > I'd like to request you for comments on this proposition. Please read > carefully above wiki page, especially focus on benefits. > > Next steps are: > * Talk on this on TC meeting > * Agree on reject implementation of this model > * if agreed prepare a plan with tasks that must be achieven to achieve this > goal. > > Again i welcome you into a discussion. > > _______________________________________________ > OM-QA mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org > _______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
