I was indeed talking about this sentence: “In 1 year we will have another same poll and see how things go.”
29.08.2016, 00:25, "Kate Lebedeff" <[email protected]>: > Hi > > Yes, and we followed the promise > > Point is simple - 64 runs on almost anything, and maintaining 586 requires > certain work, which we could redirect very efficiently > > Conclusion: if 586 is indeed demanded, sure there will be 1-2 volunteers > (more is not needed) who will jump in to take care of it > > If there will not be 1-2 volunteers for it frm our dozens thousand community > - well... Then it is not worth it > > I just summarized seversl TC and council discussions on the topic > > Let's catch up on wednesday and get to a conclusion > >> On 29.08.2016, at 00:15, Raphaël Jadot <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> A poll is what we told we would do. >> >> https://blog.openmandriva.org/2015/06/i586-we-follow-your-say/ >> >> For info, there are people currently using i586 version. Latest examples in >> mind are >> >> https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/conflicto-x11-server-common-al-querer-instalar-drivers-amd/667 >> https://forum.openmandriva.org/t/lx3-problem-during-installation-i586/609 >> >> 28.08.2016, 23:27, "Kate Lebedeff" <[email protected]>: >>> *please let me know what we should ask for/ communicate to community >>> >>> Or shall we discuss it on wednesday to make sure we are all on same page? >>> >>>> On 28.08.2016, at 22:30, Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Very good, absolutely agree about disabling i586. >>>> But you sure, that we need to disable armv7hl? >>>> I'm maintaining it ;) >>>> >>>> 2016-08-28 16:35 GMT+03:00 Kate Lebedeff <[email protected]>: >>>>> Hey Tomek >>>>> >>>>> We had it in plan to say bye to i586, but it was decided that out of >>>>> respect to the last poll results we had - we will first ask community if >>>>> there are any volunteers to maintain it fully. If none within (1 week? ), >>>>> then we move on >>>>> If there will be someone - well, good:) >>>>> >>>>> Shall i make the relevant call? >>>>> >>>>>> On 28.08.2016, at 14:58, Blackcrack <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> have we now a 686 ? >>>>>> yes, i am, because Notebooks and other 5/686 computers on the way.. >>>>>> so long they are exist should the 586/686 exist .. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 28.08.2016 um 14:42 schrieb Tomasz Paweł Gajc: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, does anyone have anything to disable i586 builds on cooker ? >>>>>>> Further i'll create list of i586 packages that are really needed to >>>>>>> support applications on x86_64 and arm. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> OM-Cooker mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> OM-Cooker mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OM-Cooker mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org >>> , >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OM-Cooker mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org >> >> -- >> Raphaël J. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org -- Raphaël J. _______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
