That's like a small fraction of the number of repos we have in OpenMandrivaAssociation. Hell, we have so many it doesn't even load in mobile view..
I feel like the packages should be moved to like OpenMandrivaLx or something. I dunno. It's just really unwieldy, and any github user visiting github.com/OpenMandrivaAssociation will get lost right away unless they know what package they're looking for. On 15 Sep 2016 14:02, "Raphaël Jadot" <[email protected]> wrote: > But lot of repos is not unusual: https://github.com/coreos > > > > 15.09.2016, 19:58, "Raphaël Jadot" <[email protected]>: > > Knowing that people don't necessarily understand the diff between > > https://github.com/OpenMandrivaAssociation > > https://github.com/OpenMandrivaSoftware > > > > 15.09.2016, 18:49, "Robert Xu" <[email protected]>: > >> On a sidenote: we have a crap-ton of repositories in > >> OpenMandrivaAssociation. I personally dislike that just because > >> there's just _too much_ (also hard to distinguish repositories), but > >> it should be noted that we should either disable issues on all those > >> repositories or add them to waffle.io (see > >> https://github.com/waffleio/waffle.io/issues/1814). > >> > >> Just because - how on earth are people going to find > >> OpenMandrivaAssociation/OpenMandrivaLx when there are thousands of > >> other repositories hiding it? (Ignoring just linking > >> issues.openmandriva.org.) > >> > >> On 15 September 2016 at 12:43, Robert Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> A quick evaluation from my view: > >>> > >>> Waffle.io provides only one board, but it imports all issues to the > >>> board automatically. This might be messy now, but we can definitely > >>> work with it (Inbox/Bugs/Requests/Backlog/In > >>> Progress/Review/Release/Resolved). > >>> I'm a little concerned about bug load, but we'll see how it works. > >>> > >>> As for Github Projects, you can create multiple boards to work with > >>> it. For example, you can create a board for every sprint. But for a > >>> continuously evolving distribution like ours, this may not be a good > >>> idea because it does not provide the option to automatically import > >>> all issues to a board. This can limit us, especially when triaging > >>> and/or maintaining tasks. (Also, I don't trust people to not "forget" > >>> about the project management tool... again.) > >>> > >>> Waffle.io seems like the safer option right now. We can re-evaluate > >>> Github projects again later. (Like when Waffle integrated with it: > >>> https://bot.waffle.io/) > >>> I'd recommend that you try Github projects out yourself to figure out > >>> if you like it better or not, and report back. > >>> > >>> On 15 September 2016 at 12:00, Robert Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> It's already live at Github.com. I'll be evaluating it as well. > >>>> > >>>> On 15 Sep 2016 11:45, "Raphaël Jadot" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> Robert told about the fact that Github just annouced the new > «projects» > >>>>> service by github. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://github.com/blog/2256-a-whole-new-github- > universe-announcing-new-tools-forums-and-features > >>>>> > >>>>> Documentation is already there so it should not be long before it's > >>>>> shipped. > >>>>> https://help.github.com/articles/tracking-the- > progress-of-your-work-with-projects/ > >>>>> > >>>>> I agree Robert that if we could avoid navigating between different > sites, > >>>>> it could be better, so I'd prefer using github projects instead. > Besides of > >>>>> this, no objection. > >>>>> > >>>>> 15.09.2016, 13:14, "Colin Close" <[email protected]>: > >>>>> > During a discussion about the implementation of the RRL for > OpenMandriva > >>>>> > the need for a project management tool was identified. > >>>>> > Some thought that our current tool (OpenProject) was to > complicated for > >>>>> > the purpose and an alternative online service called waffle.io > was suggested > >>>>> > as a managment tool for this purpose. > >>>>> > You can view information about this tool here > >>>>> > https://github.com/waffleio/waffle.io/wiki/Recommended- > Workflow-Using-Pull-Requests > >>>>> > A working version of the interface can be viewed here:- > >>>>> > https://waffle.io/OpenMandrivaAssociation/OpenMandrivaLx > >>>>> > The tool uses github fto provide some of it's functionality. > >>>>> > There were too few people at the TC meeting for it to be quorate > so a > >>>>> > meaningful vote was not possible hence this cooker post which it > is hoped > >>>>> > will allow those who were not present to express their views. > >>>>> > If after two days there have been no serious objections the tool > will be > >>>>> > considered adopted. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > _______________________________________________ > >>>>> > OM-Cooker mailing list > >>>>> > [email protected] > >>>>> > > >>>>> > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml. > openmandriva.org > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Raphaël J. > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> OM-Cooker mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml. > openmandriva.org > >>> > >>> -- > >>> cheers, Robert :: rxu.io > >> > >> -- > >> cheers, Robert :: rxu.io > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OM-Cooker mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml. > openmandriva.org > > > > -- > > Raphaël J. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OM-Cooker mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml. > openmandriva.org > > -- > Raphaël J. > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org >
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
