Hi all: I am not sure we want to put the "axe" to Kahinah before adding this functionality to ABF.
I recall back in Nov 2014 everyone agreed to move to Kahinah for testing and voting. I guess the workflow is not working. We need to agree on the workflow and use it. Otherwise, explore what it takes to add "voting" if nothing else to ABF. I am not that close to the process and need to be, since I do some testing. We should publish a general workflow to follow. Regards, Efrem Mc Reference: Stated back on 11-13-14: (I just cut and paste.. no edits...) 3. Policies on stabilizing other branches than cooker - We recognize policy that is crutacl to OMV distribution consistencty between cooker and other branches - all kind imporvements(commits) related for other than cooker branches MUST not overrun cooker, unless exceptional cases that must be discussed on TC. Commiting FLOW: cooker (master branch) -> own testing -> backport to other branches -> QA testing (kahinah) -> publishing to repository On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Tomasz Gajc <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd go further, and id' suggest to kill kahiniah, because we agreed long > time ago that ABF will be extended with voting functionality. > So when kahinah is alive then ABF will never reach new functionalities. > > 2016-12-08 7:56 GMT+01:00 Crispin Boylan <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi all >> >> As no-one is really voting on updates for 3.0 it seems to have left >> kahinah in a bit of a state. >> >> >> There are loads of updates which have either been published or rejected in >> abf but are languishing on kahinah making it difficult to see what really >> needs to be tested. Some (hopefully!) minor enhancements to kahinah could >> really help this situation: >> >> * Allow the maintainer of an update to reject it entirely, this would >> elimate dud/superseded updates where the only thing the maintainer can do is >> downvote it. >> >> * Update the kahinah list with the actual state of the package (ie instead >> of only looking at Complete or Testing Published, if the update is >> 'Published' then move it to published in kahinah, likewise if it is >> 'Rejected' on ABF then reject it in kahinah. >> >> >> is any of this achievable relatively quickly? >> >> >> thanks >> >> cris. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-QA mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-qa_ml.openmandriva.org > _______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/mailman/listinfo/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org
