> I personally would like there to be a unary integration, as the inverse of > unary differentiation, and would find it hard to argue for the existence > of one and not the other.
I'm confused by this thread. I tried to trace it back but I couldn't find the origin of this issue. For indefinite integration OM has only had unary integratikn operator taking a function. There've been some proposals to add a form that takes a term and a variable, but not to remove the existing symbols, has there? David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Om3 mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3
