Michael Kohlhase skrev 2014-04-16 10.56:
Dear all,

I would like to re-start the OM3 process -- I apologize for dropping the
ball on this. But if we start now, we can have something to report until
the OpenMath workshop in Coimbra. Could you please tell me if you are
still interested in contributing to the process?

Yes, I am still interested.
/Lars Hellström

PS: Cc:ing [email protected] because my first mail to [email protected] got bounced by atlas2a.jacobs-university.de[212.201.44.15].

The situation below is still accurate (including the OM3 mailing list).
So, let's restart this.

Michael
On 1.10.13 10:04, Michael Kohlhase wrote:
Dear all,

the summer is over, and the dust of the new semester (for me) has
somewhat settled, so we should get on with our mandate to look at
extension of OM2, possibly with a view towards an OpenMath 3 standard.
I have attached JHD's meeting minutes; here are the relevant parts,
with my comments inline

MK listed some change suggestions.
1. Better r^ole system (MK/FR)
2. n-ary binders (see Hellstr ?om's second presentation)
3. first-class sequences (Horozal/Kohlhase)
4. first-class records (Kohlhase)
5. flexForm CDs
6. Notation Definitions
7. DefMPs
8. Document/develop CD writing tools (see Hellstr ?om's first
presentation)
9. Recognise Content MathML as an encoding.
10. Bug reports

Some of these issues are already raised (and discussed in the TRAC at
http://trac.mathweb.org/OM3 I propose to just adopt the TRAC as an
open resource for discussion and planning. Everyone interested is
invited to make an account at
https://trac.mathweb.org/register/register and tell me the account
name (please no funny characters and blanks) and I will give you
permissions. I expect that we will have to clean up some obsolete
issues, and resolve the rest. Furthermore, we should collect all
change proposals out there and put them onto the TRAC, so that we can
work them off.

He therefore proposed a Standards Extension Committee, to meet and
deliver an opinion
before the OpenMath Meeting 2014 (at CICM 2014 in Coimbra). This
proposal was carried.

DPC noted that MathML was proposed by W3C to be "elevated" to ISO
standards, with the
process to start in 2013 already. This might impose some time
constraints, though it was
not totally obvious precisely which these were at this stage.

Membership MK, DPC, JHD, LH, CL, CAR, JWK. the Committee was given
the power to co-opt.
Working The Committee should work via an open mailing list, and
Skype calls.

I had hoped that we could initialize this process using the
[email protected] but I am unsure about group membership, and I have
not heard from Jan Willem on the matter. So I am writing to you
individually and cross-posting to the list for archiving (see
http://openmath.org/pipermail/om3/). I suggest we keep this pattern
until the mailing list matter is resolved.

I propose to announce that we have started work on the general OM
mailing list, and invite everyone to join the OM3 mailig list (or be
put onto the addressee list of this thread) and look at the TRAC or
the OM3 archives. Furthermore, we should invite people to make
standards enhancement proposals by posting to the TRAC (everyone
authenticated can do this).

We should also have a kick-off skype meeting; would next week suit
(generally, I will set up a doodle).

Michael






-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof. Dr. Michael Kohlhase, Office: Research 1, Room 168
Professor of Computer Science Campus Ring 1, Jacobs University Bremen
D-28759 Bremen, Germany tel/fax: +49 421 200-3140/-493140
skype: m.kohlhase [email protected]
http://kwarc.info/kohlhase
----------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Om3 mailing list
[email protected]
http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3



_______________________________________________
Om3 mailing list
[email protected]
http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3

Reply via email to