Dear Michael, dear all, first of all, happy new year :-)
Michael, I proof-read your extensions to the German article – great that you extended it to the same level as the English article! On Sunday 30 December 2007 12:49:52 Michael Kohlhase wrote: > So at least the Italian (Olga?) and Czech (???) pages, which are very > rudimentary should be extended. For other national wikipedias, it might > be a little harder to establish an OM page. But certainly doable. By “harder”, do you mean that it will be hard to find authors who speak that language? I don't think so – how about our friends from Spain, the Netherlands, etc.? (BTW, it doesn't seem that Olga is the author of the Italian article.) Otherwise, it should be easy to place a well-written article (e.g. a translation from de or en) in any Wikipedia. No Wikipedia project should reject it due to irrelevance. > I for > instance had some problems translating the word content dictionary to > German. But I think your finding “Inhaltslexikon” is fine. > So there is the aspect of > bringing your native language up to the 21 century. ;-) – Yes, I agree, that's an important issue. Best, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701 _______________________________________________ Om mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om
